Fun posting ridiculous OLD profile screenshots

FlexpertHamilton

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jun 10, 2020
Messages
2,357
Reaction score
2,829
Location
US
Narcissism levels in this profile are off the charts.

You just know she made this profile purely for validation fuel from all the simps "omg you're beautiful and so smart!!!" I bet you $100 probably hasn't even been on a date from it.



1.jpg
 
Last edited:

FlexpertHamilton

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jun 10, 2020
Messages
2,357
Reaction score
2,829
Location
US
Judging by the roses only, that means this girl is in your area's standouts, so she IS "popular".

You know she's had plenty of matches and dates based solely on that 2nd pic.
What's interesting about roses is I've never gotten a single date from sending one, often not even a response. Sending a rose is extremely obnoxious since it displaces all the other likes, forcing the receiver to either respond halfheartedly or swipe left (latter is easier). When a girl sends me a rose, unless she's 7+, I always swipe left or just send a BS reply just to get her off the queue of likes sent to me, otherwise I can never see any new likes I get.

Funny enough, I often end up seeing the same girls in the normal feed later on anyway. I think in their mind, any guy who sends a rose must be a tier below their normal match pool, even though people within your normal match pool can send them too. It's yet another reason why paying for Hinge+ would probably be counter productive, unless you're an absolute gigachad who gets 50+ likes from woman per week and can't sort through them all, none of the perks are useful.
 
Last edited:

BPH

Master Don Juan
Joined
Nov 8, 2010
Messages
2,003
Reaction score
433
Location
Wilmington, DE
What's interesting about roses is I've never gotten a single date, or even a number, from sending a rose, most of the time not even a reply. I no longer do it. Funny enough, I often end up seeing the same girls in the normal feed later on anyway. I think in their mind, any guy who sends a rose must be too low tier to even respond to, even if it was from the normal feed that you pick from, they have no way of knowing. It's yet another reason why paying for Hinge+ would probably actually harm more than help.
I got a match with the one I most recently gave a rose...but I also made a post about her "give me a week to think about it" response...so I don't know if I would call that a win.

I just throw it at the hottest one in my standouts in case things go well, because otherwise they'll never appear in my normal feed.
 

FlexpertHamilton

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jun 10, 2020
Messages
2,357
Reaction score
2,829
Location
US
I got a match with the one I most recently gave a rose...but I also made a post about her "give me a week to think about it" response...so I don't know if I would call that a win.

I just throw it at the hottest one in my standouts in case things go well, because otherwise they'll never appear in my normal feed.
Getting a match and response means nothing lol. And that response you described means low interest.

I got a metric fvckton of matches but my conversation rate from matches -> dates is absurd, it's easily less than 10%. It's all a numbers game just like cold approach.
 

BPH

Master Don Juan
Joined
Nov 8, 2010
Messages
2,003
Reaction score
433
Location
Wilmington, DE
Getting a match and response means nothing lol. And that response you described means low interest.

I got a metric fvckton of matches but my conversation rate from matches -> dates is absurd, it's easily less than 10%. It's all a numbers game just like cold approach.
Yeah, but we're men.

The reason OUR matches don't turn into dates is because our girl picked somebody else.
 

FlexpertHamilton

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jun 10, 2020
Messages
2,357
Reaction score
2,829
Location
US
Yeah, but we're men.

The reason OUR matches don't turn into dates is because our girl picked somebody else.
I don't think so. A lot of women admit to using OLD with zero intention of ever going on a date. It's just more narcissistic supply to many of them. Most of them are on 2-3 dating apps at once, IG, snapchat, just an endless funnel of attention.
 
Last edited:

The Duke

Master Don Juan
Joined
Feb 4, 2008
Messages
5,353
Reaction score
7,905
Age
47
Yeah, but we're men.

The reason OUR matches don't turn into dates is because our girl picked somebody else.
Or no one at all.
 

BPH

Master Don Juan
Joined
Nov 8, 2010
Messages
2,003
Reaction score
433
Location
Wilmington, DE
I don't think so. A lot of women admit to using OLD with zero intention of ever going on a date. It's just more narcissistic supply to many of them. Most of them are on 2-3 dating apps at once, IG, snapchat, just an endless funnel of attention.
Point is that for us not getting a date, it's because we didn't "win out".

A woman not going on a date, if she's even mildly attractive, is entirely because she chose not to.
 

Fruitbat

Master Don Juan
Joined
May 3, 2013
Messages
3,323
Reaction score
2,425
Anyone who spends $200 on a first date is stupid. Maybe $500 on up if it's a nice escort but $200 on a date lol.

I'm sure there is a lot of betas who make 150k a year who spend that on a first date though. First meeting should cost no more than $25 for a coffee, ice cream or a couple cheap drinks. The second meeting I can see spending $80 including tip. I would never go fancy unless in a relationship.

This creates free dinner date women and hurts the rest of us.
if I clearly liked the girl and I didn’t detect entitlement AND she wasn’t earning good money I would spend maybe $120 on a first date. That’s a modest restaurant in my city.

others I would suggest the pub, mini golf….it depended really. My wife first date was like $100.

on topic, one girl (pretty hot) had a profile which literally said “I’ve got 4 kids from 4 men but at the age of 22 I want a nice guy. I’ve had enough bad boys”. No shyt. 22! to be fair to her I have no idea how she did it as she was very slim and quite pretty.

what puzzled me with OLD was I could get what I consider quite good women, but it was the super hot ones I struggled with but also the low value ones. A few times I saw women close to me, just about do able and I thought im bored, why not. They never got back. Then sometimes I spoke to women I believed close to out of my league and they did.

my main objective on old was finding what I thought of as undervalued assets lol. Women who did not do the whole makeup, photo studio LV clothes thing BUT would look good dolled up or naked. There was a lot of nice women on there if you looked beyond the witchcraft of the top tier.

makeup, lighting, hairdos etc can make a 5 an 8 and an 8 a 5. It’s so integral to attractiveness and a lot of guys don’t spot it as we are visual and can’t critically analyse what’s going on.
 
Top