The Truth About Women

[malz1]

ok. here's the issue. the way you describe women, I see nothing but an ape acting on auto-mode. no reasoning, no thinking, no responsiblitiy. and I think you are right about them. what I care about is not getting laid. what I care about is doing things for the right reason. the way you describe things as right or wrong is based on how women respond in order to get laid. but no one ever talks about if a woman should respond that way or not? why are women getting all the right to do any **** thing they want? I think they've been spoiled rotten and we keep letting them act that way. why should a woman not be responsible for steering society in a direction when all sorts of ****ed up losers get respect and the real valuable people are mistreated. they should start taking responsibility for their actions. they can not do any things that hurts the society as a whole. it's like we're all suposed to be civilized, good and reasonable in all walks of life except when it comes to sex. then we're supposed to forget everything and **** like two dogs. don't you see there's something very very wrong here?

I do believe women should be more accountable for damages over men, but why must they be controlled? Why should there be a girl for most guys? Everyone's entitled to their own choices. It appears your idea of "should" is a couple steps from slavery, man.

 

[jon87]

This post makes me think if the concepts of intelligence and free will are not just human idealism. If so, moral in itself has no meaning and Nietzsche was smarter than what I thought, at least in concern with our sexual behavior.

Maybe human consciousness works in levels, and our sexuality is in a kind of low level biological place, where moral has no rule, and that woman is naturally lower in consciousness than men.

That explains a lot to me of human behavior.

A man that can push the right emotional buttons of a woman is like having Megan Fox going to you, tied in a chair, open your zipper and suck your balls, for woman sex begin there, the problem is that we judge them from our perspective.

 

[Metanoia]

It's very well-written and shows a strong perspective on women. Thanks for posting it

 

[ChristopherColumbus]

This post makes me think if the concepts of intelligence and free will are not just human idealism. If so, moral in itself has no meaning and Nietzsche was smarter than what I thought, at least in concern with our sexual behavior.

Maybe human consciousness works in levels, and our sexuality is in a kind of low level biological place, where moral has no rule, and that woman is naturally lower in consciousness than men.

That explains a lot to me of human behavior.

A man that can push the right emotional buttons of a woman is like having Megan Fox going to you, tied in a chair, open your zipper and suck your balls, for woman sex begin there, the problem is that we judge them from our perspective.

In exercising your reason, you are already presupposing freedom... the freedom to choose the most rational belief. And this is where practical reason always trumps theoretical reason.

 

[DEEZEDBRAH]

This post makes me think if the concepts of intelligence and free will are not just human idealism. If so, moral in itself has no meaning and Nietzsche was smarter than what I thought, at least in concern with our sexual behavior.

Maybe human consciousness works in levels, and our sexuality is in a kind of low level biological place, where moral has no rule, and that woman is naturally lower in consciousness than men.

That explains a lot to me of human behavior.

A man that can push the right emotional buttons of a woman is like having Megan Fox going to you, tied in a chair, open your zipper and suck your balls, for woman sex begin there, the problem is that we judge them from our perspective.

Nietzsche is smarter than you and everyone could have ever thought.

Biology hardwires men to spread the seed and women to push hypergamy until she hits the wall. This is baseline.

Most fail to evolve beyond said state point.

We're seeing the whole pc culture push for moral superiority when in fact, said individuals are cowardice. They haven't integrated what Jung referred to as the shadow.

To be capable of murder and choosing to live peacefully versus moralizing due to cowardice. This is feminism, SJWs, make feminists, and white knights. Sack less wonder.

 

[DEEZEDBRAH]

I do believe women should be more accountable for damages over men, but why must they be controlled? Why should there be a girl for most guys? Everyone's entitled to their own choices. It appears your idea of "should" is a couple steps from slavery, man.

And yet, male resources are extracted. Men's children are removed or men are taken out of their home.

Women are both perpetrators and victims. More then half domestic violence is initiated by women. Step up like a man and be prepared to be put down like a man. Not reality. Tough guy one sec. Victim hood the next

It's not all things nor being is equal. You ain't kobe kuz. It's cool. Neither am I.

The problem is not equal opportunity. It's determinism of outcomes.

Imagine if sex was distributed the way resources are expected to be by the Marxist retards.

It's don't judge her for being a slut and single mom but BRB guys, toxic masculinity!

BRB guys, beta male shaming!

I saw a link whereby Pamela Anderson was demonizing sex appeal. The same std dumpster that exploited her best years as every young males wet dream. Gtfo

 

[malz1]

And yet, male resources are extracted. Men's children are removed or men are taken out of their home.

Women are both perpetrators and victims. More then half domestic violence is initiated by women. Step up like a man and be prepared to be put down like a man. Not reality. Tough guy one sec. Victim hood the next

It's not all things nor being is equal. You ain't kobe kuz. It's cool. Neither am I.

The problem is not equal opportunity. It's determinism of outcomes.

Imagine if sex was distributed the way resources are expected to be by the Marxist retards.

It's don't judge her for being a slut and single mom but BRB guys, toxic masculinity!

BRB guys, beta male shaming!

I saw a link whereby Pamela Anderson was demonizing sex appeal. The same std dumpster that exploited her best years as every young males wet dream. Gtfo

What is your point exactly?

 

[DEEZEDBRAH]

What is your point exactly?

Reading comprehension son.

Don't quit your day job.

 

[malz1]

Reading comprehension son.

Don't quit your day job.

Ok

Edit: I really like to see people's awarenesses to societal hypocrisies but your ideas are fragmented without a clear, unifying focus or goal.

 

[DEEZEDBRAH]

Ok

Edit: I really like to see people's awarenesses to societal hypocrisies but your ideas are fragmented without a clear, unifying focus or goal.

Smash or next set. You wut?

 

[Reykhel]

Ok

Edit: I really like to see people's awarenesses to societal hypocrisies but your ideas are fragmented without a clear, unifying focus or goal.

Ignore that silly bugger.......I can't make head nor tell of what he's on about in his posts.

we suspect he's a troll. He simply regurgitates garbage that he has read from red pill sites and youtube videos like an over excited chimpanzee on lsd swinging from one idea to the next with no coherency whatsoever. Overexcited add tweeker

 

[DEEZEDBRAH]

My take on his statement 'make her feel sad and angry' is that you do it on a small level. ie tell her a sad story 'Tell stories about your sick puppy' thats one example from the original post. That being said i do also believe that things need to remain postive overall.

It's Julien drama 101. Obv, that dude went full retard and got kicked off planet ****ing earth some years ago. There's a YouTuber that collaborates with the 21 convention. One of the guys was just saying to intentionally bring drama to the relationship of your own doing for the sake of it. Then drop it. Don't bring it up. Essentially, cut threads.

In my blue pill days, I don't know how or wtf either of those two were talking about? There's something to drama and women that is polarizing. It's depicted throughout the smut best seller fifty shades book series or movies. Being remote, distant, contradicting oneself, essentially being ambiguous like a chick is what she seeks from a masculine alpha male. Peterson mocked the feminine fantasy archetype, that being: billionaire, surgeon, doctor, vampire, pirate, werewolf. I had a good chuckle as well.

It seems absolutely psychotic to operate in said manner and fashion. Ironically enough women spend their better years cratering smv chasing sociopaths. Of course, her twenties are for finding herself.

Translation: skiing down cawk mountain. Chad's proteins doing the backstroke in her rectum, vag, and digestive tract. She's mature when he stops calling.

It's the oldest trick in the book. Cucks and betas eat it up, hook, line, and sinker. If you're GoT 'low born,' manlet, beta, ugly, incel, TFL, FAer, you can take a more heroic path in not pursuing cratered smv, plummeted smv, single moms, Chad's booty call, and other low hanging fruit. Probably easier for me to say it but I would rather my genes be weeded put of existence in the pursuit of top form smv. The alternative being escorts, call girls, stripper blow job's, and renting mini vans to go GTA on the world.


Not doing it right. More resources to yourself. Own a SRT. Travel the world. Start a biz. Explore your options and find a good place to live. You can pick up your business and spend a lot of money on yourself.

 

[IKO69]

I remember reading this back in the day when I first joined (2005). Being older now I can tell you some of his points on the behavior of women is spot on. His personal conquests are exaggerated though.

 

[krass]

I really don't get why people are so excited about this article. Let's put the obvious exaggerations aside for a second.

It should also be obvious that whatever you spend the most time doing, you tend to get really good at. So the guy spends most of his free time running game on club sluts, and gets to bang other men's chicks. Imagine my shock. Club sluts are so easy to get, and the emptiness you feel after you **** them is so bizarrely profound, that I've since turned down club sluts who obviously just need to use a guy for rebound after ****ing up their most recent relation****. And no, I didn't misspell relationship.

Self selection is a thing. It doesn't matter what area in life, it still works the same way.

The best jazz drummers are the ones who spend most of their time studying and playing jazz drums. The best strikers in football are the ones who spend most of their time figuring out how to trick the defenders and get the ball past the goalies. The best PUAs are the ones who spend most of their free time becoming the guy club sluts like to use for validation. I think this is a **** way to spend time, but that's a whole other matter.

If he wants to spend his life being validation backup supply for women with low self worth, more power to him. I don't think that's smart but hey, his life, his funeral. The thing that irks me is how he then tries to market this as applying to ALL WOMEN. LOL.

Name me one field, just ONE, where if you get good enough you get 100% success rate. Go on. I'll wait.

Actually I won't wait. It doesn't exist. Not only does it not exist, but anyone claiming that it does is trying to sell you something. There is no such thing as a jazz drummer going to any gig at any venue and killing it every single time. It doesn't matter who we're talking about, it's just not how life works. That's why rehearsals are a thing. There is no such thing as a striker who scores a goal every game no matter if it's a familiar stadium or if it's the first time he played there. You'll never convince me otherwise. Sure you'll have a winning streak for several games once in a while but batting averages are a thing and always will be.

And yet this guy says he can just walk into any fresh venue and take home a random chick who's never met him before on the spot any day of the week? Balls. Big, sweaty, hairy balls.

Now I don't deny that maybe he spent a ton of time working hard on this to get to a high level of competence. What I don't understand is how that suddenly translates to the conclusion that "all women can't be trusted"? I thought we're dealing with rational thought and logic in this place.

If he would've said instead:
"I have fined tuned my approach so that in the venues I frequent and the demographic I interact with, the type of girls who would use men for validation and don't mind cheating on their spouses to do so would be very receptive to me and my overall vibe", that would make sense and we would have no choice but to agree with him based on the data he presented. Again, we're putting aside the obvious exaggerations.

But what he's actually saying is:
"I have fined tuned my approach so that I have 80% success rate in any venue at all across all demographics of women, even though the same rate of success has never been recorded in other areas of life that are more formally studied than pickup. And not only that - based on my dubious assertion above, I claim to have unlocked the ultimate mystery of women - namely that they are ALL sluts and can never be trusted."

Again.. bollocks

 

[Grounded eagle]

This article is right on the money. And like this guy, I also wish I didn't know sometimes. It's actually depressing to think about if - like this guy - you grew up believing in these disney cartoon/chick flick romances. That somewhere out there, there is an attractive woman with a beautiful personality that isn't going to leave you for every man that just happens to have a great game.

But after playing the role of the guy the girl cheats on her boyfriend with so many times, I pretty much look at couples all the time. I look at her boyfriend standing right next to her thinking he's the luckiest guy in the world. He's smiling, he's having a great time, he thinks he's living in some perfect world with a romance that could only be out of some fairy tale. And I know the minute she walks away from him, I could take her. If I really wanted her, I would. I mean, every attractive woman has a boyfriend. If you let boyfriends stand in the way the most you're going to get is some ugly chick who *****es about how the world works and how her cat always ****s on the carpet.

And I can understand completely how the guys their girlfriends leave for me feel. I've had it happen and it's probably the worst feeling in the world when you believe that everything is perfect, you're in love, etc. And she runs off with your best friend.

There are times where I find myself wanting an actual relationship. But it's impossible when you know that no matter how good you are, no matter how many tips you find off of this website, no matter how long you've been with her... She'll cheat on you if she gets the chance. And if you try to take that chance away from her, she's going to break up with you because she feels trapped. There's nothing you can do. She's going to cheat. So, I stick to one night plans. For one night (or week if that's how long it takes to get her in bed), you live out your romance. But that's where it ends. It doesn't go any further. You end it there so you don't get hurt.

I was talking to another guy the other day. We ended up getting into a conversation about women and he says, "I seem to be the guy that the girl always cheats on. By the way, my names Bryan". He extends his hand, and I look at him and say "Nice to meet you, Bryan. I'm the guy they leave you for". That's pretty much where our conversation ended.

I was talking to a girl about this the other day. She gives me the usual, "not every girl is like this". But then she mentions, "look at all these couples who have been married for 60 years". And I say to myself, "I wonder how many times she cheated on him and how many times the poor fool forgave her and said 'just don't do it again'" because he didn't want his fairy tale ending to be ruined.

And how the hell are you supposed to look at this topic positively? I mean, yeah. Women cheat. More sex for us. But none of us are going to find a relationship where we can live out some dream we once had about settling down and finding a woman you can put all your trust in and say anything to. Because we know the truth. And no matter how positively you try to think about the truth, the truth still hurts. Doesn't it?

The humble beginnings of the black pill lol.

 

[Rainman4707]

This sentence is from the original poster "Victorian society, or many Arab societies, are examples of how society used to be structured to keep women as faithful as possible."

I have read his post a few times. Great post. After starting to reread the post this morning i noticed the above. Surely that is very sexist. Look at what is going in Afghanistan right now. Women don't have many rights over there, to say the least. No wonder women wanted equal rights with men like OP saying stuff like that. Ridiculous!

 

[stringpuller]

This was definitely worth resurrecting from the archives.

 

[stringpuller]

still no responses from anyone in an LTR? i'd like to hear some of those.

Its all true. Every angle

 

[stringpuller]

I swear I saw this before a long time ago. It's very similar to MrSex4uNYC type stuff that I read way back in the day. I was interested so I dug his stuff up.

http://groups.google.com/group/alt....t+of+mrsex4unyc&rnum=7&hl=en#44ca9a7ef574a2fb

Those two people kind of sound the same to me. Even if they aren't it's a good read for some people that need a boost. I know I did starting out at this.

And about the LTR thing that ooh Nasty wanted. Here it is.

I'm in an LTR. Great girl. After reading this, again, I feel the same way. Sure, those things could happen to anyone, and they have. But you have to be the one that enforces your relationship. You have to build trust together over time. You have to lay a foundation of love and expand it together. It's a partnership. The two people do these things together, not with one having doing all the work. If that's the case then get the hell out yesterday. It's not worth it. But the keepers are the ones that know what they have and will do anything to stay. Same goes for the guy. He knows it's good when she'd do anything for him, and vice versa. The other person will put the others wants and needs before his/her own. That's a real relationship.


thecraftylefty

And there is always this dude after reading that post of truth. LOL

 

[stringpuller]

The truth about women....continued.

this is from the book THE GAME by Style at the buttom of the page 349.

courtney love asks Tyler Durden "do you hate women?"

Tyler relplied....." I wasnt a misogynist when I started this.... but you get good and you start sleeping with all these women who have boyfriends, and you stop trusting women."

Style then adds the following......
a side effect of sarging is that it can lowers one's opinion of the opposite sex. you see too much betrayal, lying and infidelity. if a woman has been married for three years or more, you come to learn that she's ussually easier to sleep with than single woman. if a woman has a boyfriend, you learn that you have a better chance of f$cking her the night you meet her than getting her to return a phone call later. women, you eventually realize, are just as bad as men-they're just better at hiding it.

This post is gold especially the last paragraph. Ive never seen this thread today but is vibing so much with what I have seen even in the last 8 years or so.