Actually, it's commonly known that men ultimately want affection and love. Chasing p*ssy and t!ts is very empty and all players find this out eventually after achieving X notches.No, almost nobody loves anyone idealistically. Don't tell me that the hordes of men going after women primarily for t!ts and pvssy "love idealistically".
Most do indeed, but it sure as hell also applies to men. The opportunity to "love" a prettier set of t!ts and pvssy.
I absolutely hate "theories" that are so blatantly biased as those pretending like men are saints and women aren't. It's bullsh!t with little to no root in reality. We are indeed different, but thinking we are any better because of our sex is a lie. In general we don't have much purer intentions than the average woman.
Besides, all of these manosphere theories are useless. They don't translate well into anything that can be practically applied in the real world. So what if women are opportunistic, what are you going to do about it? How does it matter? Of course women are opportunistic, what idiot says yes to a bad deal? Are you going to fvck and marry the ugliest looking woman alive if she was just sweet and kind, because of "idealistic love"? No, you sure as fvck will not.
Duh, but this really is an empty statement. Because what really is the best possible male? Best in what regard? There are as many opinions as there are people out there, maybe even a couple of dogs also have an opinion about that.
To say it's not complicated is a lie if you look at the subjective side of it. The only part that is uncomplicated is the objective side of it, that we are evolved with a strong biological drive to survive and reproduce. One way or another it will happen, if not, we fail as a species. Evolution will dictate who's kids stand the best chance of surviving and reproducing. Is it the kids of the "alpha" or the "beta"? (Those descriptors are so painfully loose, what the fvck do they even mean anymore?)
The below video sums it up best: