Master Don Juan
- Apr 30, 2006
- Reaction score
I doubt that they are "not remotely interested" in a relationship (which I would count even a soft harem as being), but simply that they cannot attain a decent enough woman and therefore have just given up; if such a gal would come up smack them in the face, they would be interested - but that is not the way that Hypergamy works. Historian-sociologists will definitely notate this sociosexual alienation, although they probably won't get the part about how women's hypergamy becoming unrestrained via female sexual choice.No one of my same age friends nor people past this age that I meet is remotely interested in a relationship with a woman let alone marriage.
Its amazing how it more like in their 20s to be engaged or even cohabitate while it should be the other way around.
I wonder what it will be 10 years from now when the results of this trend will be no longer limited to the bottom pages of sociology books.
Its not only about not being interested in investing in a relationship or a family, they genuinely dont give a fvck about society (which I can understand for many reasons), its more like they just opened a beer and decided to sit as spectators once they are done with their own personal things.
Women dont get it, society doesnt get it, the government pretends not to get it.
The part about not caring about society goes along with this alienation - especially since bachelor men pay taxes to support welfare to single mommies that have been knocked up by Chads; as I had progressed through the stage of life where a man like me in an earlier generation would have had the canonical family situation, I changed my attitude from being a "maker" to being a "taker". YouTube philosopher Aaron Clarey calls this "enjoying the decline" through minimalism and letting society devolve; this is akin to John Galt's attitude change in the book "Atlas Shrugged".