The Most Dangerous Type of Woman in the World

[jophil28]

STR8UP,

It is exactly for these reasons that I...

1) Make the girl ask me out on the "first date".
2) Only pay half for the first date.
3) Make her chase me to prove her interest.
4) If I don't at least kiss close on the first night, no second date for her.

That will sort out 95% of the users, abusers, losers and the cruisers.

However a BPD/HPD wackjob with a gold medal winning SOP will still get ya.

 

[Blue Phoenix]

That will sort out 95% of the users, abusers, losers and the cruisers. However a BPD/HPD wackjob with a gold medal winning SOP will still get ya.

Yeah. Funnily enough, the guy who says "I´d never fall for this kind of girl" is exactly the one who easily falls, lol. Never underestatimate another person, especially the wackjobs.

 

[Tazman]

I'm in agreement with the view that this is how most women operate. They simply have advantages that we don't so we have to tune our skills to get what we want.

I'm not real outgoing so I haven't been doing cold approaches, but I've gotten good at spotting interest before I make a move and that has been working for me. Sometimes I get the tease but I just shrug it off because it's something that comes with the territory. I try to look at it positively, I'd rather they try to get my attention than ignore me, I then make the decision to pursue or move on.

 

[darkstarrr]

It is exactly for these reasons that I...

1) Make the girl ask me out on the "first date".
2) Only pay half for the first date.
3) Make her chase me to prove her interest.
4) If I don't at least kiss close on the first night, no second date for her.

That will sort out 95% of the users, abusers, losers and the cruisers.

However a BPD/HPD wackjob with a gold medal winning SOP will still get ya.

Amazingly enough, one did slip through and once I realized what she was (thanks to this site) I demoted her to my rotation of FB's. Bible Belt's advice for handling these hot potatoes is spot on.

Women simply have advantages that we don't so we have to tune our skills to get what we want.

For me: this information is the answer to the original question/debate of this thread. *scribbles with pencil on a imaginary sticky note*

 

[Scaramouche]

Dear Danger,
Originally Posted by Danger
It is exactly for these reasons that I...

1) Make the girl ask me out on the "first date".
2) Only pay half for the first date.
3) Make her chase me to prove her interest.
4) If I don't at least kiss close on the first night, no second date for her.

My responses:
No1:You will become Old and Grey if you wait for a quality woman to ask you out...
No 2:fair enough,but I generally pay for the first one...
No 3:the woman who chases you isn't good enough for you.
No 4:I never overtly try,but will escort them hand on their shoulder to their car,if their body language suggests that is what they anticipate,I will give them a peck on the cheek,should they become enthusiastic,it is only an inch to move across to the lips.Having said that if they don't come across with the goods by date three or four,then they are sidelined to the reserves....they get the message.

 

[GuanYu]

Dear Danger,

No 3:the woman who chases you isn't good enough for you.

Could you explain this one a bit, Scaramouche? I thought women that chased was showing high IL and generally a good thing?

 

[darkstarrr]

I think what he meant was that a woman who will chase in a pushy kind of way with a guy is not someone who you want to be with. Its beyond easy. All you have to do is drop your drawers and show her your throbbing c0ck and your in like Flint.

Not good enough for you in the sense that sooner or later what may end up happening is some mofo will drop his drawers and she will be quick to bend over, regardless of whether the 2 of you have established any kind of connection.

Maybe thats an extreme example but thats just one of the ways to take what he said.

In general it is pretty cool to be with someone long term who you have to put effort in. Someone who won't just give it up for anyone. Meaning, someone who respects and values themself enough so the above will ring true of them.

Momma said to never love no ho.

Cheers!

 

[Scaramouche]

Dear Guan Yu,
Well.....quality women will never chase you.....as for women that do it's a bit like Groucho Marx' old chestnut"Any Club that accepts me is not good enough for me to join".

 

[DJKid]

I find this thread interesting. I can't say I've come across this type of woman. In my view girls that have a steady guy they are having sex with really want a relationship with that guy, whether they openly admit it or not. They basically rationalize that eventually he will come around but of course as guys we obviously think "why buy a cow when you can get the milk for free"

So if they happen to meet another guy that would give them the relationship, then its bye bye to the F-Buddy.

Still any girl that would blatantly use guys for chivalary while boning someone else is absolutely horrid in my humble opinion.

 

[The Conquistador]

The most dangerous woman in the world is a near sighted, drunk with a mental disorder stumbling around with a loaded AR-15. All other women should be afraid of me and being impaled on The Conquistidor's sabre of pleasure.

 

[Tazman]

Still any girl that would blatantly use guys for chivalary while boning someone else is absolutely horrid in my humble opinion.

The problem with this is that it isn't so much a "conscious" behavior, as it is simply someone having their cake and eating it.

You can't blame them for running this game on the men who fall for it, they're going to do whatever they deem is in their best interest just like most people. As long as you aren't the guy taking the bait there's nothing to worry about.

I have a friend who hangs out with this one chick (that calls him out of the blue, once in a blue moon) who will never have sex with him, but because he has no options he goes along with it I guess hoping one day she'll give in. One day he brought home a new box of condoms after visiting her leading me to believe that something had changed since the last time she told him they were just friends (lol, I had to hold the laugh in).

Of course my suspicion was correct, he was simply being used for attention. I talked to him about it before but he still does it so I don't say anything anymore, it's not her fault he can't help but be this desperate. He's one of those guys that tries to befriend women to get sex and he doesn't see the fatal flaw he makes using this approach, as in it has only gotten him an old, fat 50 y/o woman who smokes (he's 25).

 

[theborn_athlete]

This just hit me right between the eyes and knocked me on my ass.
This is the first post/threat where I have felt it was literally written for me.
Wow.
Thank you, you just set me free.

 

[Deep Dish]

STR8UP:

The Most Dangerous Type of Woman in the World

You know what the worst kind of woman is? The worst kind of woman is the one who is getting d!ck from some dude, but still "shopping around".

I must disagree. The most dangerous femme fatale is the wife who murders you for your life insurance policy (or whatever).

 

[BlackJackal]

I will agree that they all have the potential to be "this type" of woman. You know I am with you wholeheartedly on that point.

But the Schedules of Mating discussion typically revolves around a woman having a "commitment" to a provider type and seeking the genetic payday from the rogue.

What I am talking about here is not often discussed, but it is a HUGE cause of frustration and a waste of time for men.

I don't buy the idea that these women are easy to spot. I spot SOME of them up front (such as the one in my example) because I have my eyes wide open. Most of them fly in under the radar. Only is she is in your social circle will you possibly have a clue about who is fukking her, and even then it's only a guess most of the time.

And that is what i am specifically talking about here. The damage that is done by these "dangerous" (maybe a bad choice of word) women who come in displaying all of the classic signs of interest, who string you along adds up. Even if you are hyper-aware because you KNOW this type of woman's game (or any type who withholds intimacy), you are still likely to waste time meeting up with her to feel her out.

That is all I am saying here. It's like you have to cycle through at least a half dozen to find ONE that doesn't prove to be a waste of time, meanwhile the chick gets everything SHE wants from the deal. Attention, validation, communication, and often times FREE SH!T. That's the fukked up part.

I place a high value on my money and an even higher value on my time. Perhaps this is a big part of the reason why I have little desire to "date" in a traditional sense or even spin a bunch of plates. It's a bunch of time and energy expended that women get the main benefit from. I would rather be the guy getting the no obligation pu$$y, and that comes around often enough that I don't have the need to drop a bunch of coin and waste a bunch of time pursuing a lot of women outside my social circle.
See where I'm going with this? Essentially, it's a no-lose situation for the woman. She gets the freedom to date around without any obligation to give up the poon. The guy has to cycle through several of these two date Sally's before he might land one that has potential to provide him with what he is looking for.

Thats exactly how I feel. Most of these of these women can be a waste of both. I dont date myself never had to. I set a time limit that I'm willing to place on a girl before it expires for her. The more she does to contribute to the point of letting me hit it, the more time she adds on for herself.

If she's barely trying then when times up, I just cut her off with no explaination.

 

[STR8UP]

I must disagree. The most dangerous femme fatale is the wife who murders you for your life insurance policy (or whatever).

Maybe "dangerous" is the wrong word.

I would say "damaging" but they don't really do damage. I would say "time wasting" but that isn't a strong enough word to describe them.

The point is there are sooooo many women out there who have no qualms about getting their milk from one store, their eggs from another, and their sausage from a third. This would not be a problem except for the fact that there is no obligation for a woman to give up sex (her currency) for the attention and freebies she gets from the guys who she essentially uses to extract various things she isn't getting from the guy she is fukking.

The trick is to always be the guy she's fukking, and if she doesn't give it up you cut it off in short order.

 

[Burroughs]

thread resurrection.

very important truth.

 

[Desdinova]

Thanks for resurrecting.

Moved to Tips...

 

[nismo-4]

AFAIC, all women have hidden agendas. :woo:

A woman can have a man whenever she wants. She can get sex whenever she wants. She ALWAYS chooses her love and sex life. Men somewhat have this luxury. And they don't care about hurting your feelings. :box:

If you think your princess is in another castle, she usually is.

AFAIC Women don't genuinely fall in love, men do. An exciting romance in a man's mind is business as usual in a woman's mind.

Women want that all-in-one package. Has a slim to none existence. But she Here's a partial breakdown.

1. The Handsome hunk to f**k her brains out and be her arm candy.
2. The rich man to provide for her child when #1 knocks her up.
3. The personal trainer from LA Fitness to get her body right.
4. The geek who can fix her broken iphone.
5. The thug who can protect her (by totin' Uzi's)
6. The mechanic who can fix her car when it breaks down.
7. The nice guys who spend money on her while she doesn't put out for them.
8. The guy who can up her status because he has lots of it.

It's obvious that the price of love, sex, and companionship is high as hell, and even women in their 50's have lots of choosing power. Far more than what they did in the 90's.

Women are far more shallow than men, especially these days. Entitlement issues are at an all time high. :kick:

It's what I've been seeing lately.

 

[The Experience]

Every woman needs a gaggle of men - - CNN

Seems inevitable?

 

[Burroughs]

from the link: Listen up you bishes... it's your nurturing and selective nature that makes you anything more than a fleshlight to us. By slooting yourself around you turn yourself into the very "sex object" you supposedly deplore being seen as.