A Woman's Job

[Desdinova]

A woman's job, as a companion, is to revitalize her man.

The man is her warrior. He goes out, brings home the food, and usually meets a few challenges while bringing home the food. He also protects her from the silly AFCs who try to fvck her.

The man also locates shelter, and does the necessary maintenance to keep the shelter in good shape. Shelter is necessary to fight against the evils of nature.

The man is tired after a day of being a warrior and doing things that guarantee survival. The woman needs to take care of her man so he can continue to be her warrior. She should be cooking the food he brings home, massaging his tired muscles, and bringing him pleasure which he has earned through his hard work.

THIS is the primary function of a woman in a relationship.

A woman who disrespects a man who attempts to shelter her and bring her food should be left to fight off the elements of nature and find her own food. She is not worthy of having a warrior in her life.

 

[Desdinova]

A woman should not challenge her warrior. She will not win.

 

[The Duke]

Des- that sounds a lot like the 1955 guide published in Good Housekeeping on how to take care of your man.

I read so many dating profiles and often see things like this(even dated a few of them):

-I have an awesome career
-I have my own money and can buy my own things
-I own my home
-I love my job
-I don't need a man

Well good for you sweetie, we don't give 2 fuhks about that schitt. You drank the Kool-Aid and traded your feminine ways in to be masculine and now you can't find a guy that sees value in you anymore than that nice azz of yours.

Many are oblivious to the things MEN actually desire in the opposite sex. Look at the language the resident females use on this forum.

 

[taiyuu_otoko]

A woman's job, as a companion, is to revitalize her man.

BS.

All humans are programmed to get the most return for the least effort.

Women aren't any different. Women have been effectively conning men since the dawn of time, and for the large part, men have been falling for it.

Every single one of us (man and woman) is faced with the same problem.

Interacting with the world to get what we want.

There is no "should." There is no universally accepted "roles" for men and women. Men get away with whatever they can, women get away with whatever they can.

Nobody on earth gives a nano-fvck what anybody thinks they SHOULD do or what anybody thinks their "role" SHOULD be.

UNLESS it is in their best interests to believer your idea of what they SHOULD do.

Women can get all the things you mentioned (food, shelter, income, respect, admiration, approval, validation) without EVER having to submit herself to any deluded "warrior."

I suppose you could pull the "God card" and refer to the bible to support your ideas, but that only works on women that believe in that stuff.

It is up to every single male to FIND a woman and CREATE THE INCENTIVES that generate the behaviors in said woman desired by said man.

If you can't do that, you've got three options:

1) Whine about the market and the state of feminism today

2) Try to rely on some rules that exist OUTSIDE OF YOU (and created by people other than you) to make the woman "behave" - this is very similar, in structure, to socialism, where people have a set of rules they think "other people" should enforce to make it easier for the individual

3) Improve your woman training skills

I'd say that the VAST MAJORITY of men on sosuave are either in group one (blaming the market) or DATING SOCIALISTS, in that they rely on an EXTERNALLY CREATED set of rules that they expect to do the women training work for them.

ECONOMIC SOCIALISM

I need a certain amount of money, and I expect the government to do the dirty work of collecting that money from other people and giving it to me.

DATING SOCIALISM

I need a certain amount of love/respect/loyalty/pvssy and I expect some set of EXTERNAL RULES that make women behave a certain way so I don't have to.

 

[AJ84]

I'm sure there are people out there who would happily take on those roles, but men who want to take on the Warrior/Provider role and woman who want to be the Little Missus are a rare breed in this day and age. It's no longer the norm.

 

[Bible_Belt]

If you want to be an entrepreneur, it helps a lot to have a wife with a good job.

 

[AJ84]

If you want to be an entrepreneur, it helps a lot to have a wife with a good job.

That's the thing. Two incomes are a necessity in many parts of the modern world now, and even then....
I used to watch that reality show 19 kids and counting. The family lived comfortably in a patriarchal/ Christian lifestyle where birth control was not allowed (hence 19 kids). That family was doing ok financially but many other families with the same lifestyle pointed out that that family makes a lot of money for being on TV while similar families are really struggling, with the head of the household responsible for feeding and clothing large families while the wife just keeps popping them out.
Not realistic. One of the sons was outed for molesting his sisters and cheating on his wife with some AM hooker but that's another story.

 

[Billtx49]

If you want to be an entrepreneur, it helps a lot to have a wife with a good job.

Very true. In the beginning financially stressful years of a new business, full family expenses can put a capital drain on and slow the growth speed of the business.
I managed it, but two other men I know got their ventures up and running faster because their wifey was pulling in around 100K/yr to take up the family expense slack.

 

[derby1]

my original LTR (10 years) who i had my daughter with, i split up with her 6 years ago
she went onto have another child with another man...who she split up with for whatever reason

she now has two children The Uk Government then become her husband She Needs no man

she gets given a very nice 2-3 bedroom house, local rates paid and a little lump some of money in her bank EVERY FRIDAY without fail

none of the advice on this forum would work on her if you were her chap

the only ace card you have on these women is to cease giving her cash directly for your the said child....the woman soon becomes very friendly

apart from that she NEXTS men quicker than a spark to petrol, women are becoming the alpha male

 

[Billtx49]

women are becoming the alpha male

Wrong. Alphas aren’t leech’s. She’s just another woman using the feminine leaning system to her financial advantage.

 

[derby1]

Wrong. Alphas aren’t leaches. She’s just another woman using the feminine leaning system to her advantage.

i think you knew what i meant as a whole, billtx ,

the male and female mentalities have swapped places your well aware of this, even more so when your given a house for free and weekly GUARANTEED cash all of her behaviour is that of a master don juan and she doesnt even realise

 

[Billtx49]

i think you knew what i meant as a whole, billtx ,

the male and female mentalities have swapped places your well aware of this, even more so when your given a house for free and weekly GUARANTEED cash all of her behaviour is that of a master don juan and she doesnt even realise

Her behavior is similar to that of a welfare recipient, not a DJ.

 

[derby1]

Her behavior is similar to that of a welfare recipient.

don juan needs nothing can go alone , welfare recipient needs nothing can go alone

master at indifference, master at walking away cause she getting paid anyway on friday and has a warm VERY NICE house over her head

shell outwit and outwait you just as good as you do her

spins plates

cba to go on

 

[Billtx49]

don juan needs nothing can go alone , welfare recipient needs nothing can go alone

master at indifference, master at walking away cause she getting paid anyway on friday and has a warm VERY NICE house over her head

shell outwit and outwait you just as good as you do her

spins plates

cba to go on

How much child support did you get saddled with to pay her monthly?

 

[taiyuu_otoko]

And if anything the idea of getting people to behave a certain way through their own psychology IS what is preached by game

That was my point. It's the individuals responsibility to get any particular women to behave the way he would like her to.

It's kind of useless to expect some large externalized "system" (god, government, society, evolution, etc.) to do it for him.

 

[zekko]

The man is tired after a day of being a warrior and doing things that guarantee survival. The woman needs to take care of her man so he can continue to be her warrior. She should be cooking the food he brings home, massaging his tired muscles, and bringing him pleasure which he has earned through his hard work.

THIS is the primary function of a woman in a relationship.

I agree that a woman should revitalize her man, but some of this has to be viewed in context with the modern world. I expect my (live in) girlfriend to have her own money. I'm not going to pay for her car or her healthcare, she has a job. I know some guys here are like "My wife would never work, I shall support her". And that's cool and all, but it appears most guys here are mostly just interested in having "plates", so they're not going to be supporting or providing for their women like this warrior you're talking about.

I do think that women are good nurturers and caretakers, and they excel at giving comfort (except the b!tchy ones).

 

[va2000]

...THIS is the primary function of a woman in a relationship.

A woman who disrespects a man who attempts to shelter her and bring her food should be left to fight off the elements of nature and find her own food. She is not worthy of having a warrior in her life.

I like this post very much. I understand why people take umbrage, but I think it's merely because they are missing D's point. These are the primary functions of womanhood, as determined by evolutionary biology, from a man's perspective. D never said the state or even some Christian Grey contract should be invoked to achieve said ends.

Just as women a free to drop a chump for failing to adequately embody the hypergamous traits she hungers for, the warrior-man is free to next a woman who has no interest in fulfilling these roles. It is still worth a mention and can be worth discussing with one's woman... not in a demanding way, but in the sense that this is what I saw in you that makes you valuable to me. There's nothing beta or socialist about communicating your frame.

 

[Desdinova]

I agree that a woman should revitalize her man, but some of this has to be viewed in context with the modern world. I expect my (live in) girlfriend to have her own money. I'm not going to pay for her car or her healthcare, she has a job.

I agree 100%. I never said that she should be home all the time, but if she has a job and her own money, she should STILL be able to do revitalize her warrior. IMO, there should always be a possibility for her to be jobless, especially if children come into the picture. IMO, children should be taken care of by at least one parent until they're at the age where they can attend school, unless it's decided that the child should be home-schooled.

But I'm jumping way ahead of things. The act of the woman revitalizing her warrior should be evident early on.

 

[exhausted]

I agree 100%. I never said that she should be home all the time, but if she has a job and her own money, she should STILL be able to do revitalize her warrior. IMO, there should always be a possibility for her to be jobless, especially if children come into the picture. IMO, children should be taken care of by at least one parent until they're at the age where they can attend school, unless it's decided that the child should be home-schooled.

But I'm jumping way ahead of things. The act of the woman revitalizing her warrior should be evident early on.

I agree completely but that type of society is long gone.
Sadly now a woman would rather drop her new born baby off at a daycare and let a stranger take care of it. Fuching terrible.
So if today's women doesn't even care for her own kids properly anymore God knows they lack the same for their husbands.

Failure of today's marriages is on the woman for being low quality.

 

[exhausted]

Women NEED men. Not the other way around. Men, don't let the Wonder Woman "No men zone" feminist movement fool you. Women NEED d*ck.

Des, you made some good points.

Tell them that.