The truth hurts rape liar

[Warrior74]

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/b...4 bx63gpD1ouI

A young mother who falsely cried rape, sending an innocent man to prison for nearly four years, will experience firsthand what he suffered -- she'll spend one to three years behind bars for perjury.

It turned out Gonzalez robbed McCaffrey of four years of his life for the most trivial of reasons.

She'd been hanging out with a group of girlfriends when she accepted an invitation to get into his car.

After she returned, her pals were furious that she'd ditched them -- so she made up the rape story to gain their sympathy.

Read more: http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/b...#ixzz0gThh2JgI

Fvcking disgusting.

[CaptainJ]

Just goes to show that when it's the woman's word against the man's, the women will always win.

[Trader]

Originally Posted by CaptainJ

Just goes to show that when it's the woman's word against the man's, the women will always win.

What's really interesting is that the ancients always knew of women's tendency to be untruthful.

In ancient Jewish culture, a woman's testimony was completely invalid in the court of law. Perhaps that is a bit too extreme, but they were definitely on to something.

In cases like these, where there is lack of circumstancial evidence and it's just a woman's word against the man's and the man is the defendant - tie should go to the man.

[wjh]

Originally Posted by Trader

In cases like these, where there is lack of circumstancial evidence and it's just a woman's word against the man's - tie should go to the man.

No, there should just be an acquittal based on the lack of substantial evidence. Gender should have nothing to do with it.

[Jitterbug]

He spent nearly 4 years in prison and she will only spend 1-3 years, probably out after 6 months on good behaviour.

Pvssy pass.

[synergy1]

accountability, our country has none.

People are retarded. The women for crying rape all the way down the inept corrupt "justice" system which put away someone guilty of nothing.

[Danger]

And there are people that believe she deserves leniency because she "confessed"........however she only confessed AFTER DNA evidence exonerated the man!

[mrRuckus]

Why does she have to go to prison? Shouldn't she just learn her lesson because he walked away? Don't you know the best revenge is living well?

[WhitePimp]

He should get a free pass to actually rape her now. He already got punished for it so he might as well.

[boomerick]

She should get DOUBLE what ever he served with no parole. This would be fair AND send a message to b!tches everywhere.

He can never, however, get those four years back no matter what happens.

[Jitterbug]

Originally Posted by mrRuckus

Why does she have to go to prison? Shouldn't she just learn her lesson because he walked away? Don't you know the best revenge is living well?

Exactly! I mean, what an AFC! What do you think James Bond would do??!!!

[taiyuu_otoko]

Originally Posted by Jitterbug

Exactly! I mean, what an AFC! What do you think James Bond would do??!!!

You guys are confusing the issue. The phone break up (which I suppose you all are alluding to in your sarcastic posts) is a guy's choice on how to deal with a situation he found himself in. He could have walked away during any time during those five years, but he didn't. He could have done a number of things, and he chose to humiliate her in part as revenge over the phone. Some agree with that choice, some don't.

this, however, is a pure case of misjustice. Everybody, the judge, the jury, the cops, the DA, are all guilty of stereotyping a guy with a criminal record based on an overt lie of a seemingly innocent single mother.

Despite what many of you would like to believe, ALL woman aren't PURE evil ALL the time. Sometimes you really do have a choice to walk away, and you really are responsible for the choices you make in life.

The phone guy did, this poor fukker didn't.

They should put this bytch in the same goddamn prison cell he spent four years in, with the same inmates, and see how she likes it.

[Danger]

Let us, however, not forget the commonality of the two situations.

• Both are women who exhibited poor behavior.
• Both are women who performed actions that DIRECTLY affected a man in a very negative way.
• Both continued to carry through with the poor behavior over a matter of time.
• Both only showed remorse when caught.
• Both represent a failure of men to hold women accountable for their actions.

[Rescue Mission]

The muslims got something right after all - women do not get away with bad behavior like this in the middle east. Woman would probably have her head cut off for lying about rape like this (and rightly so).

[jonwon]

Originally Posted by Warrior74

Fvcking disgusting.

Yes I hate stuff like this, compiled against the daily mindfcuk of reading my local paper and seeing the scorn women spill out in the comments section about men - In this instance blaming men for women fleecing the benifits system in the UK by getting knocked up and getting free housing.

Makes me really get fuc*ed off with the opposite sex.

Sweet and spice and all things nice? Like fuc* they are. I understand this is 'not all women' - but seeing the ticks of approval at the comments section of a piece that blames men for womens choice to get knocked up, shows rather clearly this stink goes deep, real fuc*ing deep.

How many guys are getting butt raped now because a women wanted a little attention, by trying to get the government to give her that fix by falsly accusing a man.

Seriously some days I detest the female sex, I have to really try to get my emotions in check when confronted with this much cra* daily - The matrix is an ugly place when you can see it in all it's dirty glory.

She also should have got the same sentence he would have got if convicted, but she wont, just like any other crime women commit and get lesser sentences for.

Incidently I've noticed a pattern with women that is 100% true.

Any negative comments or actions about women, by a man is met with scorn and disdain by other women - Women can pass comment though, freely.

But they have zero problems with tossing that scorn out about men and they pat each other on the backs for it - the most vile the better - seriously - read any comments section in a local paper that is remotley men bashing and the ugly truth comes out, plain has day.

The sister hood is alive and well - That is the majour problem men face, it's like them v us - I'm not making this shi* up - they act like one giant mind fuc* patting each other on the back for all the vile shi* they spew about men - and they have zero problems where that spew is written, public forum or not -

Too many women are now nothing but bitter shrews who think getting 'back at men' is a virtue. It wouldn't suprise me if you dont see one or two comments on that piece from women saying 'the man deserved it'.

Here we go:

"No one needs statistics to know that most rapes go unreported. In any rape case the woman is the loser, always. And this guy had a long history of violent crime. So crawl back under your rock haters".

---

"AnJo - overwhelming majority of rapes go unreported for reasons hinted at below. Despite reporting what percentage get prosecuted? Almost none..."

Though in all fairness, it's just made my day reading all the comments from very clued up men in the street - who will help to shift this cra* back in motion - i'm also under no illusion the the reason she got sentenced in the first place was due to men getting pis*ed off with the system and speaking out.

[Proselytiser]

On one hand women will lament that the way the legal system handles rape is flawed, on the other hand they will report guys for anything they can... one night stand becomes date rape, break-up sex becomes rape, etc.

[WhitePimp]

What exactly is the law regarding this? I can't fathom a legal system that would just automatically take a woman's word against a man in something as serious as rape. I mean, what's next? "I saw that guy murder someone! Okay, lock him up for 20 years..."

I understand rape actually DOES happen, and obviously the man is going to deny it, but really, doesn't occasionally some evidence have to be presented rather than just taking a woman's (or anyone in general) "word" for it?

[Proselytiser]

What evidence can there have been?

- She got in his car, on the street. Friends would have witnessed this as well as others
- He has a criminal record
- She was all emotional

[taiyuu_otoko]

Originally Posted by Proselytiser

What evidence can there have been?

the article didn't mention specifically, but I'm assuming they had sex, and changed her story after the fact. So there might have been actual evidence of sexual intercourse, and with his history of "violent arrests" she could have claimed that she was too scared to do anything, so there wasn't any evidence of forced entry.

So you've got evidence of sex, a guy with a violent past, and she claiming she was raped.

It's not that much of stretch to see how could get locked up, with the deck stacked against him so much.

[jonwon]

Regardless what the evidence is.

There are 100's of stories where man have been arrested on simply the say so of a woman.

I could dig many out, but it would take time and I can't be arsed - It's not that hard to find just do a google search.

A woman only has to say you raped her and if you dont have a solid alibi, your pritty much guilty until proven innocent.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...oard-jail.html

http://vlex.co.uk/vid/false-rape-stu...-term-60756328

A few more to sink your teeth into, just from a 1 minute search on google.