05-06-2009, 01:28 PM
|
#61
|
|
Master Don Juan
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 2,528
|
I'd be very interested to see what you could squat as low as you could go.
The 180 video on the last page was a quarter squat and an ego booster, sorry to say- but I'm saying it the way it is. Also very bad for the knees.
I would think an ass to grass attempt would definitely be below you max deadlift, which would align the numbers properly. Although I do hope you can prove me wrong.
Apart from that, keep up the good work.
|
|
|
05-06-2009, 01:31 PM
|
#62
|
|
Master Don Juan
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,355
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Kerpal
The vast majority of the time, people who squat more than they deadlift are simply not squatting to full depth.
|

|
|
|
05-06-2009, 01:36 PM
|
#63
|
|
Master Don Juan
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: New Jersey
Age: 24
Posts: 1,197
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Flyer
Meal 1: egg, weetbix
Meal 2: pork, rice noodles
Meal 3: pork, vege soup
Meal 4: potatoes, chicken, smoked salmon, rice
I dont think I'm making any real progress, my bodyweight has been fluctuating between 61-63 everytime I weigh myself.
Advice is appreciated.
|
What's the goal with body weight? Are you eating anything else? If your trying to grow four meals is not going to cut it unless they are enormous. Pork also isn't the greatest tool for bulking as it's higher in fat content than protein. Not saying you can't have bacon but you could add red meat, chicken, turkey
__________________
"Bodybuilding is much like any other sport. To be successful, you must dedicate yourself 100% to your training, diet and mental approach." - Arnold
|
|
|
05-06-2009, 01:37 PM
|
#64
|
|
Master Don Juan
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 2,528
|
Exactly Kerpal.
Its important to remember that the powerlifters who are putting up squats several hundred pounds more than their deadlifts are using equipment to do so, and are usually only hitting parallel. If you put on one of these suits you have to load 300-400 on the bar just to be able to hit parallel.
Take away the suits, and magically the several hundred excess comes right back off, take it as low as possible, and the deadlift will be on top.
|
|
|
05-06-2009, 06:10 PM
|
#65
|
|
Master Don Juan
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,355
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Quagmire911
Exactly Kerpal.
Its important to remember that the powerlifters who are putting up squats several hundred pounds more than their deadlifts are using equipment to do so, and are usually only hitting parallel. If you put on one of these suits you have to load 300-400 on the bar just to be able to hit parallel.
Take away the suits, and magically the several hundred excess comes right back off, take it as low as possible, and the deadlift will be on top.
|
Yeah, and most powerlifting squats I've seen aren't even close to full depth. There's a lot of cognitive dissonance going on at most powerlifting meets. I went to an APF meet a few months ago just to check it out, and during the squats I was thinking to myself "They call that a squat?  " Example: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xUrhOWcby3U
|
|
|
05-10-2009, 01:24 AM
|
#66
|
|
Senior Don Juan
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 395
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Quagmire911
I'd be very interested to see what you could squat as low as you could go.
The 180 video on the last page was a quarter squat and an ego booster, sorry to say- but I'm saying it the way it is. Also very bad for the knees.
I would think an ass to grass attempt would definitely be below you max deadlift, which would align the numbers properly. Although I do hope you can prove me wrong.
Apart from that, keep up the good work.
|
Probably around 110. PR front squat was 102.5.
Got exams coming. Taking opportunity to ease off the gym (deload) for the next 2 weeks.
9/5/09 - Saturday
Burgener Warmup.
Deadlift
5x 80
5x 100
5x 107.5
11x 107.5
Bench
5x 40
5x 50
11x 60
6x 60
Snatch
3x3 - 40
ES chest - 7.5kg 1 minute (lol. that was humbling)
ES shoulders
Spine Decomp.
Pullups
4x8
@ Itallion
Ideally I would like to get to 69kg. Plan of attack to get there would generally be more volume work - i.e. 8x reps instead of 4x reps, and eating ALOT more.
But I think there's yet more strength/power to be achieved at current weight before moving on.. i.e At least snatching 60 would be good.
__________________
Eat like an animal. Train like you're on drugs. Grow like a beast!
1.68m 60kg 9% bf
Bench: 85 /Squat: ? (for Kerpal)  /
Deadlift: 160 /OHP: 75 /C&J: 100 /Snatch: 75/
|
|
|
05-10-2009, 07:07 PM
|
#67
|
|
Master Don Juan
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,355
|
So did you ever actually hit a 180 kg full squat?
|
|
|
05-11-2009, 06:40 AM
|
#68
|
|
Senior Don Juan
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 395
|
To parallel on the 3rd attempt.
lol.. I'm gonna count it. 
__________________
Eat like an animal. Train like you're on drugs. Grow like a beast!
1.68m 60kg 9% bf
Bench: 85 /Squat: ? (for Kerpal)  /
Deadlift: 160 /OHP: 75 /C&J: 100 /Snatch: 75/
|
|
|
05-11-2009, 06:42 AM
|
#69
|
|
Master Don Juan
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,355
|
What is "parallel"?
Got a video?
|
|
|
05-17-2009, 03:44 AM
|
#70
|
|
Senior Don Juan
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 395
|
rraaggghh.. Its been one week since i last trained. Exam on coming tuesday... grrr.
16/5/09 - Saturday
Burgener Warmup + barbell benches
Hang Snatch
3x 30
Snatch
2x3 40
3x 45
3x 50 (missed a few times before I got this)
OH Squat
5x 40
5x 45
3x5 50
Power Cleans
8x 60 (felt gooooood)
Clean & Jerk
3x 70
Pullups
3x8
@Kerpal: parallel is what you make of it.. i.e. half squat, not ATG, normal squat. No video was made since the attempt you saw on page 3.
I dont even look at mirrors in the gym when I do snatch/c&js.. reckon it messes with the 'awareness' level.
__________________
Eat like an animal. Train like you're on drugs. Grow like a beast!
1.68m 60kg 9% bf
Bench: 85 /Squat: ? (for Kerpal)  /
Deadlift: 160 /OHP: 75 /C&J: 100 /Snatch: 75/
|
|
|
05-17-2009, 03:59 AM
|
#71
|
|
Master Don Juan
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,355
|
So you're counting the one in the video as a "parallal" squat?
|
|
|
05-17-2009, 06:00 AM
|
#72
|
|
Senior Don Juan
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 395
|
Yup.
__________________
Eat like an animal. Train like you're on drugs. Grow like a beast!
1.68m 60kg 9% bf
Bench: 85 /Squat: ? (for Kerpal)  /
Deadlift: 160 /OHP: 75 /C&J: 100 /Snatch: 75/
|
|
|
05-17-2009, 06:23 AM
|
#73
|
|
Master Don Juan
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,355
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Flyer
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Kerpal
What happened?
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Flyer
You mean why didnt I go to parrallel depth? It felt very shaky I guess. I dont remember but that was the 2nd attempt, didnt go low enough the first time as well.
|
Hm...
|
|
|
05-17-2009, 06:46 AM
|
#74
|
|
Senior Don Juan
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 395
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Kerpal
Hm...
|
?..
__________________
Eat like an animal. Train like you're on drugs. Grow like a beast!
1.68m 60kg 9% bf
Bench: 85 /Squat: ? (for Kerpal)  /
Deadlift: 160 /OHP: 75 /C&J: 100 /Snatch: 75/
|
|
|
05-17-2009, 06:47 AM
|
#75
|
|
Master Don Juan
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,355
|
You said it wasn't parallel, now you're saying it was.
|
|
|
05-17-2009, 07:02 AM
|
#76
|
|
Senior Don Juan
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 395
|
lol. smart cookie.
It would have been something similar and slightly lower to that shown on the video on the 3rd attempt. For simplicity's sake, I responded with a 'yup'.
__________________
Eat like an animal. Train like you're on drugs. Grow like a beast!
1.68m 60kg 9% bf
Bench: 85 /Squat: ? (for Kerpal)  /
Deadlift: 160 /OHP: 75 /C&J: 100 /Snatch: 75/
|
|
|
05-17-2009, 03:57 PM
|
#77
|
|
Master Don Juan
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 2,528
|
It wasn't parallel. Not OUR parallel Kerpal
I still think parallel is bs anyway.
|
|
|
05-18-2009, 01:22 AM
|
#78
|
|
Master Don Juan
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,355
|
It is. That's why "hip joint below top of knee" is the right way to do it. None of this "parallel" bull****, it's just too ambiguous and hard to judge. IMO, If the top of your thigh at your hip joint was not below the top of your knee, it wasn't a full squat, and it didn't count, period. If there's any question at all, then you should have gone a few millimeters deeper and it wasn't a full squat and it didn't count, period. If you were wearing anything other than normal gym clothes, and maybe a belt, then it didn't count, period. If it was done with anything other than standard free weights and a rack (no monolift), then it didn't count, period. If anyone touched you or the weight anytime between when you descended and when you stood back up, then it didn't count, period.
I'm tired of seeing **** like this called a "squat": http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xUrhOWcby3U Don't even get me started on the bench. Powerlifting was such a cool sport, but the gear and cognitive dissonance have ruined it. People are claiming totally ridiculous numbers, by cheating and ****ty judging, and it discredits the sport and the lifters. It's just like story of the Emperor's New Clothes, everyone in the room knows it's ridiculous, but nobody wants to say it out loud. Powerlifting has become a joke for the most part.
I still think the raw, (belt is OK for safety, straps are OK if grip is a limitation, because you never need to hold onto a 400 lb + bar outside of a gym) conventional (not sumo) deadlift is the best all-around test of strength. Technique isn't a big factor, it's a pretty fair test (unless you have t-rex or orangutan length arms) and there's not really any way to cheat (except for hitching) so none of this garbage like Flyer is pulling, with people claiming 400+ lb "squats" when they're really quarter-squatting, and can't even pull 315 off the floor.
Sorry Flyer, but the "squat" you posted was a joke, I don't think it was even a quarter squat. If your claimed 180 kg "squat" was only slightly lower, than it still wasn't even close to a full squat, it probably wasn't even a half squat. That's why your "squat" is 40 kg higher than your deadlift. I hope you didn't "squat" that high for the entire Smolov cycle, because if you did then you wasted 13 weeks of training. If you would like to disprove this by squatting 180 kg under the above criteria and posting a side-view video, I'd love to see it and will retract my statement. Otherwise please edit your sig, because it's ridiculous.
Last edited by Kerpal : 05-18-2009 at 02:27 AM.
|
|
|
05-18-2009, 02:27 AM
|
#79
|
|
Senior Don Juan
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 395
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Kerpal
It is. That's why "hip joint below top of knee" is the right way to do it. None of this "parallel" bull****, it's just too ambiguous and hard to judge. IMO, If the top of your thigh at your hip joint was not below the top of your knee, it wasn't a full squat, and it didn't count, period. If there's any question at all, then you should have gone a few millimeters deeper and it wasn't a full squat and it didn't count, period. If you were wearing anything other than normal gym clothes, and maybe a belt, then it didn't count, period. If it was done with anything other than standard free weights and a rack (no monolift), then it didn't count, period. If anyone touched you or the weight anytime between when you descended and when you stood back up, then it didn't count, period.
I'm tired of seeing **** like this called a "squat": http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xUrhOWcby3U Don't even get me started on the bench. Powerlifting was such a cool sport, but the gear and cognitive dissonance have ruined it. People are claiming totally ridiculous numbers, by cheating and ****ty judging, and it discredits the sport and the lifters. It's just like story of the Emperor's New Clothes, everyone in the room knows it's ridiculous, but nobody wants to say it out loud. Powerlifting has become a joke for the most part.
I still think the raw, (belt is OK for safety, straps are OK if grip is a limitation, because you never need to hold onto a 400 lb + bar outside of a gym) conventional (not sumo) deadlift is the best all-around test of strength. Technique isn't a big factor, it's a pretty fair test (unless you have t-rex or orangutan length arms) and there's not really any way to cheat (except for hitching) so none of this garbage like Flyer is pulling, with people claiming 400+ lb "squats" when they're really quarter-squatting, and can't even pull 315 off the floor.
Sorry Flyer, but the "squat" you posted was a joke, I don't think it was even a quarter squat. If your claimed 180 kg "squat" was only slightly lower, than it still wasn't even close to a full squat, it probably wasn't even a half squat. That's why your "squat" is 40 kg higher than your deadlift. I hope you didn't "squat" that high for the entire Smolov cycle, because if you did then you wasted 13 weeks of training. If you would like to disprove this by squatting 180 kg under the above criteria and posting a side-view video, I'd love to see it and will retract my statement. Otherwise please edit your sig, because it's ridiculous.
|
ok.
__________________
Eat like an animal. Train like you're on drugs. Grow like a beast!
1.68m 60kg 9% bf
Bench: 85 /Squat: ? (for Kerpal)  /
Deadlift: 160 /OHP: 75 /C&J: 100 /Snatch: 75/
|
|
|
05-18-2009, 02:29 AM
|
#80
|
|
Master Don Juan
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,355
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Flyer
ok.
|
So when are you posting that video?
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:14 PM.
Kirsch designed by section02
|