Hello Friend,

If this is your first visit to SoSuave, I would advise you to START HERE.

It will be the most efficient use of your time.

And you will learn everything you need to know to become a huge success with women.

Thank you for visiting and have a great day!

Is anal sex natural?

speed dawg

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jun 9, 2006
Messages
4,808
Reaction score
1,242
Location
The Dirty South
I want to just throw that out there. I am a big believer in getting back to the way nature intended things to be. I personally am a Christian, but I am going to stay away from that for purposes of this thread. After that, I happen to believe that the 'best' way to do things is the 'right' way, or the natural way.

This leads me to anal sex. Whether or not you care about gay rights or whatever, how can anyone argue that gay sex is natural and pro life? It basically prevents children from being born, and the people performing it most likely are breeding their genes out of the population. THIS ARTICLE gives you a bunch of reasons why it is alright, but this:
If you and your partner start slow, work your way into insertion with smaller implements like fingers and sex toys and use plenty of lube, pain will be the last thing on your mind.
What is the world about this seems right? Fingers in ass? Sex toys? Lube? Yeah, I get it, these things are taboo and can be useful, but should it be the STANDARD to tell people that certain things are OK? Then this:
The anus and the lower part of the rectum actually have very little fecal material in them, which means it tends to not be nearly as dirty as you think.
You've got to be f*cking kidding me. Not dirty as we think. Yeah OKAY. Again, I'm not saying that everybody doesn't get the urge to do taboo sh*t, but we are supposed to accept this perversion as if it's normal? I've heard people say that there are a bunch of nerve endings in the ass, but I'm sorry bro, there's nothing about an ******* that is inviting in my mind. This isn't porn, not everyone has had a colonic. Is it no coincidence that all these gays are running around with ass tampons and/or colitis? Is it any coincidence that women have to use MAN-MADE toys in order to satisfy each other? There it is, the key, MAN-MADE. Anything man made that is inserted into a 'natural' activity, like sex, cannot be the way it's intended to be. I don't know if anyone is following me, but still.

I could go on forever about this stuff. Pharmaceuticals? Birth control? Oh man have a I seen a difference in my wife once she kicked that sh*t to the curb.

Bottom line is, if you just look at things as nature intended, you can often find the right path.
 

Peaks&Valleys

Master Don Juan
Joined
Apr 11, 2013
Messages
1,968
Reaction score
347
If we're speaking scientifically here, are blow jobs natural?

Personally, I'm not a fan of banging chicks in the pooper. I'll do it, but it's usually if they want it or ask for it, but sometimes not even then. I can get as freaky as the next guy, but I'm just not into that, save for a rare occasion.

But to answer your question, no, I do not believe it's 'natural'. But either is a lot of **** (no pun intended) that happens in the bedroom.
 

taiyuu_otoko

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jan 10, 2008
Messages
5,243
Reaction score
3,825
Location
象外
From a horny caveman's perspective, banging a tree with a slippery hole is natural.

As far as a general rule, though "as nature intended" generally means that it supports the continuation of the species.

Guys that ONLY like vaginal sex? Check. Genes passed.

Guys that like vaginal sex AND anal/hummers/trees/sheep? Check. Genes passed.

Guys who ONLY like brown eye invasions? Nope. No genes passed.
 

FairShake

Master Don Juan
Joined
Oct 8, 2008
Messages
2,450
Reaction score
310
speed dawg said:
It basically prevents children from being born
So do condoms, the rhythm method, pulling out, and all sex that doesn't involve procreation.

I'd rather be unnatural than only have sex a couple times in my life to make babies.

Edit: I've totally banged girls in the butt. It feels good and nobody was harmed in the making. Who are you or I to judge?
 

speed dawg

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jun 9, 2006
Messages
4,808
Reaction score
1,242
Location
The Dirty South
Peaks&Valleys said:
If we're speaking scientifically here, are blow jobs natural?..............But either is a lot of **** (no pun intended) that happens in the bedroom.
I agree, I'm no hypocrite. Blow jobs are a perversion too. No way humans were meant to lick each others' crotches, we just weren't. The more rich a society gets, the more people are left to their own perversions. People need to stay busier.

I'll go a step further. I don't think blow jobs are about the 'feeling'. At least they aren't to me. It's all about the feeling of someone submitting to you. I don't see how any mouth can feel as good as a wet vagina. Ass either. This pushes home by point even further.

taiyuu_otoko said:
As far as a general rule, though "as nature intended" generally means that it supports the continuation of the species.
In the end, what else are we here to do? If you don't believe in religion, what else is there? This is why it is weird to me to see so many atheists, naturalists, etc. siding with liberals on every single issue. At the very least, shouldn't they be supporting life?

FairShake said:
So do condoms, the rhythm method, pulling out, and all sex that doesn't involve procreation.

I'd rather be unnatural than only have sex a couple times in my life to make babies.

Edit: I've totally banged girls in the butt. It feels good and nobody was harmed in the making. Who are you or I to judge?
I agree on condoms.

Sex wasn't meant to just make babies though, it was meant to be enjoyed, a release, for two people in marriage. So while you may or may not agree with marriage, sex was definitely meant to be a pleasure of the flesh.

I also never said perversions didn't feel good.

Who am I to judge? I'm me, that's who. I'm discussing a topic.
 

Bible_Belt

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
17,021
Reaction score
5,605
Age
48
Location
midwestern cow field 40
taiyuu_otoko said:
"as nature intended" generally means that it supports the continuation of the species.
Using that definition, any sex act by a female that secures the interest of a male would support the continuation of the species simply by keeping him around and increasing the chance of normal sex happening in the future.
 

Who Dares Win

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jan 16, 2012
Messages
7,545
Reaction score
5,897
I like to fvck them in the ass because its a way to asser dominance over them, same when I blow my load in their faces.

Also to know that Im marking her and even if we split up, I still own a piece of her.

The day you meet some some other guy which tells you "hi Im her new boyfriend" with a challenging face, you can answer "hi Im the one who broke her ass before you"... you know it and she knows it.

I understand I look like a terrible man and its probably true.

Also when I have a girl I want from her more than what those before me got, her ass its a good item.

Needless to say that a girl which got broken from someone else is no option for commitment.
 

Fatal Jay

Master Don Juan
Joined
Oct 26, 2012
Messages
1,746
Reaction score
115
^
dominance? Nah you can gain dominance when a chick sucks your di*ck. Never trust a woman who wouldn't suck your d*ck, that's a very submissive role to a woman believe it or not.


I love hitting a big booty chick from the back, but I have never been down with f@cking a girl in the a$$ or licking her a$$hole. Never have and never will do that gross $hit
 

( . )( . )

Banned
Joined
Dec 31, 2002
Messages
4,884
Reaction score
178
Location
Cobra Kai dojo
Is anal sex natural?
I'll punch the odd donut out on an occasion but I'd hardly call it "natural".

They tell me faggots love sodomizing other men's *******s and yet they are a demograhic that's forever leeching the healthcare system to fix health problems associated with (or at least stemming from)their anal play. Here's one such confession and the subsequent problems associated with prolonged sodomy.

I estimate I've had approximately 3,000 men up my butt ... I estimate that I went to the baths at least once a week, sometimes twice, and that each time I went I had a minimum of four patners ... I also racked up about three men a week for five years at the Christopher Steet bookstore ...Then of course there was the MineShaft; the orgies; the 55th Street Playhouse; the International Stud backroom ...

Let me present my own history of STDs. From 1973, when I came out, to 1975, I only got mononucloeosis and non-specific urethritis, or NSU. In 1975, I got my first case of gonorrhea. Not bad, I thought. I'd had maybe 200 different partners, and I'd only gotten the clap twice. But then, moving from Boston to New York City, it all began to snowball.

First came hepatitis A in '76 and more gonorrhea and NSU. In 1977, I was diagnosed with amebiasis, an intestinal parasite, hepatitis B, more gonorrhea, and NSU. In 1978, more amebiasis and my first case of shigella, and of course, more gonorrhea. Then in 1979, hepatitis yet a third time, this time non-A, non-B, more intestinal parasites, adding giardia this time, and an anal fissure as well as my first case of syphilis ... By 1981, I got some combination of STDs each and every time I had sex ...

At age twenty-seven I've had: gonorrhea, syphillis, hepatitis A, hepatitis B, and hepatitis non-A, non-B; intestinal parasites including amebiasis, e. historicia, shigella, giardia; herpes simplex types one and two; venereal warts, mononucleosis, cytomegalovirus, and now cryptosporodiosis, for which there is no known cure.
http://www.2blowhards.com/archives/2007/02/aids_and_immune.html

I'm no doctor but all in all I'd say it's not the most natural of sex acts.
 

speed dawg

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jun 9, 2006
Messages
4,808
Reaction score
1,242
Location
The Dirty South
So, we can conclude that anal sex is NOT natural, and we can conclude that sex toys are not natural. Therefore, is it not pretty obvious that, if doing one of the above is the ONLY way you can have sex with your 'partner', then chances are you're not supposed to be having sex with that 'partner'?

Sooo....WHY DO STRAIGHT PEOPLE CHAMPION THIS SH*T? It goes against any religion, life, and nature. If you don't like any of those things, I guess you simply just want destruction.
 

taiyuu_otoko

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jan 10, 2008
Messages
5,243
Reaction score
3,825
Location
象外
speed dawg said:
So, we can conclude that anal sex is NOT natural, and we can conclude that sex toys are not natural.
Not Natural DOES NOT EQUAL Harmful.

Therefore, is it not pretty obvious that, if doing one of the above is the ONLY way you can have sex with your 'partner', then chances are you're not supposed to be having sex with that 'partner'?
It's always dangerous to use words like "supposed to" when talking about religion or behaviors. That implies there some kind of rules, and some kind of rule maker.

Sooo....WHY DO STRAIGHT PEOPLE CHAMPION THIS SH*T? It goes against any religion, life, and nature. If you don't like any of those things, I guess you simply just want destruction.
I don't think they are championing the act itself, but the freedom to do so in the privacy of their own homes without judgment.
 

zekko

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 6, 2009
Messages
15,859
Reaction score
8,562
Personally I get a bit disgusted even READING about anal sex, I don't see what the appeal is. That's why the book The Sex God Method makes me a little sick sometimes, even though it has some good stuff in it also.

Whether or not it is NATURAL though, I don't know if there is really an answer to that. But I don't see bl0wj0bss as unnatural, it seems like a fairly obvious thing to do, stick your d!ck in her mouth lol.
 

( . )( . )

Banned
Joined
Dec 31, 2002
Messages
4,884
Reaction score
178
Location
Cobra Kai dojo
taiyuu_otoko said:
I don't think they are championing the act itself, but the freedom to do so in the privacy of their own homes without judgment.
This doesn't make any sense. Nobody normal gave much of a sh!t about the sodomites when they kept their degeneracy and histrionics to the bedroom 30, 40 years ago. Only started to become a nuisance when they took up the bullhorns, assless chaps and moved into the schools, MSM, workplace etc etc demanding the masses not only accept their deviancy but glorify it....or else raycis/bigot/homophobe/closet pillow biter
 

Tenacity

Banned
Joined
Jun 23, 2014
Messages
3,942
Reaction score
2,191
I think the issue is looking at this from a religious perspective, as the Bible contradicts itself almost from one book to the next, so it's really hard to take the Bible that seriously (in my opinion at least) as a set of rules for life. I do believe in God, but God didn't write the Bible, a group of dudes did which is why I believe the Bible is filled with so many contradictions.

In terms of is Anal Sex or Gay Sex "natural," well, define natural? Again if you are coming from a religious perspective, who is to say that the men that wrote the Bible didn't have an agenda? If we are going based on human creation, you don't need actual penis/vagina intercourse w/ sperm ejection to create a human being so then how could penis-vagina intercourse be the framework?

Whatever your definition of "natural" is, I believe it's as unstable as the definition of a "real man". The definition of a real man is in the eye of the beholder and USUALLY that definition is based on whatever agenda the person doing the defining has in place. If I'm the Federal Government then a "real man" is one that pays his taxes on time and fights in the military. If I'm a chick then a "real man" is one that will take care of me and my 5 kids from 5 different thugs. If I'm a spoiled brat then I would tell my Father that a "real man" is one that will pay for my $150,000 college education in African American Studies.

The issues with these debates is that there truly is no framework or benchmark, most use religion but religion in and of itself isn't a benchmark due to its contradictions.
 

taiyuu_otoko

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jan 10, 2008
Messages
5,243
Reaction score
3,825
Location
象外
( . )( . ) said:
This doesn't make any sense. Nobody normal gave much of a sh!t about the sodomites when they kept their degeneracy and histrionics to the bedroom 30, 40 years ago.
I was assuming this was about some guys who like to ram their girls' brown eyes occasionally, not those overt flamers marching in every parade they can find.

As far as "natural" it's likely that gayness shows up in X% of the population. So even though a gay dude won't reproduce, it is natural for gay people to exist and not reproduce.

I do agree with Tenacity, there's really no objective standard to measure this stuff to.

Before one even debates what's "natural" and not it might help to define what "natural" means and by whose standards or definitions.
 

speed dawg

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jun 9, 2006
Messages
4,808
Reaction score
1,242
Location
The Dirty South
taiyuu_otoko said:
I was assuming this was about some guys who like to ram their girls' brown eyes occasionally, not those overt flamers marching in every parade they can find.
Yes, it's much easier to say gay sex isn't natural, but I think if you look deeply, any type of sex outside vaginal sex is a perversion, an act use to assert dominance or to degrade. Any type of rape, vaginal or anal, would also fall into this category. That is why I don't know that it can be considered natural.

taiyuu_otoko said:
Before one even debates what's "natural" and not it might help to define what "natural" means and by whose standards or definitions.
I agree but that is what fascinates me about the whole thing. Technically, living in cities isn't exactly natural either. Sitting on toilets, etc. But aren't cities technically where perversions are fostered? Apparently you expel more poo if you squat rather than sit on a toilet. Always seems that when you get back to pure nature, things work better. At least physically. There has to be a mental balance though, that's what makes humans different from animals.
 

Gimple

Banned
Joined
Nov 18, 2014
Messages
171
Reaction score
31
speed dawg said:
Blow jobs are a perversion too. No way humans were meant to lick each others' crotches, we just weren't.
Actually, oral sex does have a purpose and serve a function outside of pleasure, which might be classed as "natural" through the lens of passing on genes.

Oral sex is a method of checking whether or not a partner has been unfaithful. Studies have proved that a person can tell if their partner has had sex with someone else within the past 3 days (or something like that) regardless of washing, by smelling and licking the genitals. The reason is that the scent and taste of the fluids change temporarily after having sex with someone.

So, from a non-pleasure perspective, oral sex is a way of getting knowledge to identify and perhaps prevent competition in passing on our genes.

If "natural" means something serves a purpose and function in the perpetuation of life, oral sex is definitely natural.
 

speed dawg

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jun 9, 2006
Messages
4,808
Reaction score
1,242
Location
The Dirty South
Gimple said:
Oral sex is a method of checking whether or not a partner has been unfaithful. Studies have proved that a person can tell if their partner has had sex with someone else within the past 3 days (or something like that) regardless of washing, by smelling and licking the genitals. The reason is that the scent and taste of the fluids change temporarily after having sex with someone.
Riiiiiiiight.
 
Top