Sexualizing Defective DNA

I think I mentioned this in one form or another while mentioning gay "families". We're well on the road to helping those with defective DNA reproduce.

Here's a model with Downs Syndrome:

http://www.cosmopolitan.com/entertainment/celebs/news/a44812/maddy-rosanne-stuart-interview/

As far as I know, modelling used to be focused on women who were very attractive, you know, ended up with genes that made them desirable to men. The modelling industry is no longer based on what men find attractive, it's based on what women find attractive. Not only do we have tatted up fatties, but now we have people with Down's Syndrome.

It's only a matter of time until we have porn stars with Down's Syndrome, and judging from a Google search, we're quite close to having it.

Women don't think of the consequences of their actions. They have no clue that sexualizing defective DNA and promoting the acceptance of gay families is slowly destroying the survival of us as a species.

Beta males are to blame, not women.

Men are supposed to be the strong sex that dominates and leads. We are failing in that capacity.

Never been into the fashion industry. From what I can observe, it's an absolute insane world driven by whatever the current emotional state of the editor-in-chief of some popular fashion house. A style now becomes obsolete next week, only to be overcome by a style that was popular 50 years ago. It's ****ing insane. I would go crazy.

I would take this as a fad, since in the past decades the fashion industry have been using thin and even thinner girls as the model, so it's just trying to be different and to freak everyone out. It's kind of like you have been wearing red shirts all year, and decided to go blue tomorrow just because.

As with feminists, these people have fantasy-esque false realities, where their hamster brains are working over time. When it comes down to it, it's all about the money. They can pay a fatty to model for them all they want, but the bottom line is, sooner or later, usually when they're wondering - "where did it go wrong?" - that business model they had is going to drive them straight out of business.

I believe there's times when to step in and let your thoughts - opinions - advice - be known, and other times it's just best to sit back and eat your popcorn. Let things naturally sort themselves out, and sooner or later, they will.

Desdinova said:

As far as I know, modelling used to be focused on women who were very attractive, you know, ended up with genes that made them desirable to men. The modelling industry is no longer based on what men find attractive, it's based on what women find attractive. Not only do we have tatted up fatties, but now we have people with Down's Syndrome.

It's only a matter of time until we have porn stars with Down's Syndrome, and judging from a Google search, we're quite close to having it.

Click to expand...

You're focusing on exceptions, not the rules. Your knee jerk reaction here is just exaggeration and dramatization. Modeling still focuses on women who are attractive, and it's going to continue to do so. Why do you care if someone with downs becomes a porn star? I already assumed there was one actually... I could google it in 10 seconds and verify, but I don't care enough because it doesn't even matter.

sharkbeat said:

Never been into the fashion industry. From what I can observe, it's an absolute insane world driven by whatever the current emotional state of the editor-in-chief of some popular fashion house. A style now becomes obsolete next week, only to be overcome by a style that was popular 50 years ago. It's ****ing insane. I would go crazy.

I would take this as a fad, since in the past decades the fashion industry have been using thin and even thinner girls as the model, so it's just trying to be different and to freak everyone out. It's kind of like you have been wearing red shirts all year, and decided to go blue tomorrow just because.

Click to expand...

Seriously, I wouldn't worry about it too much. It's the model industry...very superficial. What I'm concerned about are the parents who will use the fake mission statement "She's empowering others with disabilities" while trying to cash in on their daughter's media attention.