Search results

Today's women? When I introduced that metaphor to the community 13-14 years ago it was already an old concept. It goes all the way back to the advent of no fault divorce when women's hypergamy was allowed to finally run free and unchecked by the social mores of civilization. It's really just...

Emotional affairs is what this is in regards to. Should you catch on to what she's doing and address it, all the experts pretty much say the same exact thing I was saying above: the 3rd party has to be removed from their life now and for all time. Granted this assumes both you are going to stay...

Found this on The Red Pill: http://tinyurl.com/mo5jo39 This is long, there are no cliffs, and it is worth the read. Why your wife/girlfriend needs to suck your ****. This might be hard to believe; I know a lot of you have spent your life being told that men and women are equal...

God damn that texting in the article was painfully bad. A chick I know posted a similar, albeit abbreviated version of lopsided texting once and it was the same thing. Wall of text from the guy, a few quips back from her, and the dude just couldn't take a hint.

It's just sour grapes that a man figured out how to game the system, something traditionally reserved only for (attractive) women.

I'm 36 and my gf is 23. We don't have to many problems with people giving us crap. It helps I pass for my late 20s. In fact I was out Saturday and the group I was with thought I was 27.

I'm not really sure where to put this, but I was invited to start an advice line for www.puerarchy.com. The first batch of questions and answers will be going up shortly and it's just another way for you guys to get help should you need it. It's not entirely game/pickup related, but I so far...

Sounds to me you're giving off some sort of beta provider vibe and they're keying in on it as the wall approaches.

A women's "number" is absolutely critical information one needs to know for deciding whether or not she's worth investing in for a serious relationship. Women with lots of partners are just terrible choices to get serious with. And this isn't my opinion either...

I'll leave this here: http://therationalmale.com/2011/09/23/wait-for-it/

Solid thread. Building attraction is old school PUA stuff. These days it's all about improving yourself so that you are attractive/high status and women are interested from the get go.

Not children, teenagers ;) http://www.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/160b5u/woman_the_most_responsible_teenager_in_the_house/

Yes, typical waste of time like most online dating is.

On a related note: http://totalfratmove.com/sexual-*******s-and-emotional-sluts/

http://laidnyc.wordpress.com/2013/06/05/the-parable-of-mark-and-lauren/ Pretty interesting twist. I can't say I've seen it presented this way before. I saw it here this evening: http://www.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/1go97y/the_parable_of_mark_and_lauren/

When the weather warms up my affiliate has way more women than men.

Stopped reading as soon as I saw the author.

Rights have responsibilities, and if they want to have kids out of wedlock they absolutely should be held responsible for that decision. In this case they are going to tax them, presumably to offset the costs the state is burdened with when women have kids out of wedlock. Smart move, too. In the...

http://therationalmale.com/2012/06/04/final-exam-navigating-the-smp/

So long as his SMV is comparable to her's then they should be okay. However, now that she's a lot better looking AND has media exposure, odds are high she'll dump him for greener pastures.