Did dudes from the Manosphere vote for Obama or anyone at all?

[Bokanovsky]

I voted for Obama. You think if the other turd got in Marijuana would be becoming legal?

Did you forget to turn your brain on this morning? Marijuana is being legalized on state level. Obama has absolutely nothing to do with the passage of state laws.

 

[Kingpin Pimp]

Did you forget to turn your brain on this morning? Marijuana is being legalized on state level. Obama has absolutely nothing to do with the passage of state laws.

Who cares? The point is Obama could have easily sued and overturned the laws, and "fought it to the teeth" as Romney was quoted. Don't worry he has 3 years left to change the federal law and if anyone thinks Repubs are getting elected next cycle dream on.

 

[VikingKing]

Obama, liberals prey on the poor, uneducated, minorities, and any one desperate.

With politics is always the lesser of two evils. Honestly if you voted for Obama the first time you were either very ignorant, or your a fool.

 

[Kingpin Pimp]

Obama, liberals prey on the poor, uneducated, minorities, and any one desperate.

With politics is always the lesser of two evils. Honestly if you voted for Obama the first time you were either very ignorant, or your a fool.

I am more proud to say I voted for Obama than I voted for Bush (which I didn't).

So stick it.

 

[Kingpin Pimp]

Having no tolerance for anti American, anti capitalist, lying, hypocritical socialists doesn't make one irrational. I happen to like my country, as founded, and my disdain for those who don't and those who are supporters and apologists for them is entirely rational, toots.

But I find it amusing that anyone would call that irrational considering this entire administration and democrat platform requires support of those who vote with emotion as opposed to rational thought. Progressivism and liberalism REQUIRE irrational voters to prevail. I could give dozens of examples.

The Republican party has lost the last two presidential elections because it's not conservative and its candidates have been complete jokes. And the democrats play dirty pool and cheat. Obama cheated legally and illegally in both elections. Dozens of examples can be given for this too.

Call names and attach labels all you want, but I happen to be one of the people left in this country who can smell the anti American socialist agenda from a mile away and have no tolorance for it. Socialism and Liberty cannot exist in the same space. Freedom requires Liberty. Do the math. Rationally. LOL

BTW, the OP was asking about the manosphere. Aren't you a woman? Why are you posting?



What an amazing retort. Keep smokin' and votin', Cheech.

Maybe you shouldn't go around supporting wars based on lies? Your party is buried. I will be surprised if repubs ever win another presidential election. You can thank Bush for Obama. You created the bed now lay in it.

 

[TheException]

I liked McCain until he went full retard. My ideal hope was a McCain/Powell ticket of sense and rationality, but alas he catered to the lowest common denominator of the right and I couldn't support him. Ron Paul would have never gotten elected so I voted for the lesser of two evils which turned out to be even more evil.

Hows that for an oxymoron bolded above?

McCain has gone off the rails and Powell is even worse.

I voted for Ron Paul as well.


Personally I think those of your school of thought are part of the problem.

Your statement shows that you are not voting FOR someone, but rather voting AGAINST someone. That only works when you think the two parties are truly going in different directions.

Reality points out that if there is one thing both parties can agree on, it is that we the individuals should have less power and the Government should have more. So when you vote "against" one candidate, you really are voting for more status quo.

No pal....I actually would love to vote for some of the real conservatives but the goddamn party elects moderates thinking they will somehow win an election for once(Here comes Chris Christie).

And unfortunately you dont get THAT. You just keep on voting for whoever you want even though you vote is essentially rendered useless. Unlike you....voting against someone is much more beneficial than wasting my vote on someone who wont win. Had Romney won.....we would be in MUCH BETTER shape than we are now even though I wasnt a huge fan of Romney. It doesnt take a rocket scientist to see this.

I'm a card carrying Libertarian but I think the party is still too rigid ideologically to actually toss a vote away voting Libertarian.

So I vote for whoever has the best chance to beat whoever the American Socialist Party (aka democrats) put up. Which basicly means I'm a reluctant republican voter. Which drives me crazy since we have a 2 party system of democrat and democrat-lite.

Having no tolerance for anti American, anti capitalist, lying, hypocritical socialists doesn't make one irrational. I happen to like my country, as founded, and my disdain for those who don't and those who are supporters and apologists for them is entirely rational, toots.

But I find it amusing that anyone would call that irrational considering this entire administration and democrat platform requires support of those who vote with emotion as opposed to rational thought. Progressivism and liberalism REQUIRE irrational voters to prevail. I could give dozens of examples.

The Republican party has lost the last two presidential elections because it's not conservative and its candidates have been complete jokes. And the democrats play dirty pool and cheat.

Dom_Dom straight killing it.

You've bought into the NeoCON propaganda that mainstream Republicans like Romney are somehow better than Obama. They're two sides of the same coin.

Proaganda lol.....you really do try to "prove me wrong" in every thread. Its cute.

Romney would have been better than Obama. Period.

 

[Don_Dom]

You've bought into the NeoCON propaganda that mainstream Republicans like Romney are somehow better than Obama. They're two sides of the same coin.

Absolutely correct. Our two party system consists of The Party of Big Intrusive Government versus The Party of Really Fvcking Off the Rails Big Intrusive Government. Dozens of examples can be given.

More accurately, flip sides of the same PROGRESSIVE coin.

It will never change until the voters insist on limited government again through truly fair and capped taxation, a balanced budget requirement for all levels of government, term limits for congress, shrinking the size of federal government employment, better checks on the executive branch, disallowing congress to delegate powers to the executive branch directly or indirectly....the list goes on..

A really good first step would be simply reforming campaign finance laws for members of congress....Specificly, stop letting them personally keep their leftover campaign funds when they leave office and put dollar limits on what lobbyists can give in line with individual citizens. We allow the 1/3 of our government that controls its finances to be bribed legally on a daily basis and then wonder why we have a trillon dollar annual deficit. And nothing ever changes for the better.

I dont care which party you support....The reason why none of them care to move too quickly on anything that matters to you is because they are too busy selling you down the river and getting rich in the process. And this knows no party lines. Who cares if the NSA is violating the 4th amendment rights of every person in the country if there is no money to be made from caring? Both parties own it equally so it won't matter at the polls and there isn't a lobbyist with a suitcase of cash there to pay them to do something.

And that's what nauseates me. They keep us out here quibbling over BS....who pays what taxrs, who smokes what, who marries who, etc etc etc.....All so we don't keep our eyes on the real ball....The fact that 500-odd people in congress and a few thousand people in the lobby industry are getting rich by stealing from us and selling us down the river.

 

[Jaylan]

Props for speaking the truth. The majority of blacks voted for him for the very same reason....yet would never admit it and instead accuse one of racism had one made that claim.

Uneducated voters + stupid young people my age + minorities = Obama win.

The people that actually care about politics and government policies.....were left disappointed. We will look back on this one day and be in shock...of how we could elect Obama NOT ONCE....but TWICE.

And plenty of whites were shown on youtube and mainstream news as not voting for Obama because he was black. There are numerous videos with outspoken voters saying they did and didn't vote for him because of his skin color.

Whats that say about the majority.

Plenty of blacks and whites voted color during his elections. However, this does not mean that there weren't many folks who voted for him based on their political beliefs.

 

[Partizan]

Props for speaking the truth. The majority of blacks voted for him for the very same reason....yet would never admit it and instead accuse one of racism had one made that claim.

Blacks always vote for the Democratic candidate by 90+% margins. This includes Kerry, Gore, Clinton. It has more to do with party and less to do with race. If it had to do with race, then guys like Al Sharpton and Herman Cain would get all the black votes. This is not the case.

Uneducated voters + stupid young people my age + minorities = Obama win.
.

Those with graduate degrees voted for Obama in 2012 by 55-42% margin.

 

[Don_Dom]

Maybe you shouldn't go around supporting wars based on lies? Your party is buried. I will be surprised if repubs ever win another presidential election. You can thank Bush for Obama. You created the bed now lay in it.

And what from anything in my posts gives you the impression that I supported Bush or his policies? Because I didn't vote for and abhor Obama and his policies?

This is the problem. We have reached a point where people are happily uninformed which is very very good for the Republicrat system. In this case, the assumption that because you dont like one party you automaticly support the other. When there are only two choices between democrat and democrat-lite, if you don't like democrats you go democrat-lite. It doesn't mean you necessarily like democrat-lite.

You can come up with better candidates throwing darts at random phone book pages, but when the alternatives are complete wh0res eager to sellout their own country and its interests the likes of Gore and Kerry you really have no choice, do you? Doesn't mean you like it.

Never ceases to amaze. The problem is that most democrat voters are such blind partisans they assume everyone else is too....They always project too much, trying to or not. Dozens of examples for this, too. Don't analyze reality and think too much! Just be sure to read the Huffington Post and pull a lever for anything with a (D) next to it and free sh1t will come your way!

A lot of problems would be solved by having to pass a simple logic and civics test to be elligible to vote. Wouldn't work out for the democrat party tho. The last thing they want is informed voters.

 

[dasein]

Those with graduate degrees voted for Obama in 2012 by 55-42% margin.

And a vast majority of those are gov employees who get auto paygrade boosts for sitting through the local jr cow college's "masters program" LAWLZ. Specifically, many are teachers, members of the largest labor union in the country, the NEA, they vote in a supermajority for democrats and always have because democrats STEAL more from the productive, to GROW govt more, and PAY more to "no-workie" govt employees such as teachers. The giant democrat sh-t snowball just gets bigger and browner as it rolls over the dwindling numbers of actual productive people in this country.

But nice try trotting out the "lefties are smarter" canard with the false causal link between intelligence and merely possessing an advanced degree (often in education, LAWLZ)

 

[dasein]

Just be sure to read the Huffington Post and pull a lever for anything with a (D) next to it and free sh1t will come your way!

Perfect.

Last stat I saw was 1:14 of the population is a govt employee of some sort, state/fed. Adjusted, this would be ~ 1:8 of the actual workforce excluding kids and senior citizens. Now we add in those whose livelihood depends on govt growth and spending, and we can add in many ostensibly private sector folks: grant seeking private uni employees and related support, gov contractors of all types particularly defense, most lawyers, all the way down to cousin larry's tow business that makes more money when demos enlarge the deadbeat dad business in the name of "our children." Adding in all these folks doubles the gov dependency in the workforce IMO and IME to 1:4. I'm not even going to try to figure in all the derelicts who vote demo so their check keep comin in the mail on Friday, would that take it down to 1:3 or even lower? Let's just stick to 1:4.

It's not any "ideological divide" among people who truly believe they are doing the right thing and simply disagree, but rather a very few righteous ideologues, a bunch of politicians as usual, and HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF loser scumbags who rationalize their wasted skin and complicity in thievery by professing "causes" instead of being a productive human being working in the private sector. On the one hand, you have a GOP with at least a few who are operating on principle as to what they believe is right and just governance in accord with our history, whether they are ever successful or not (Reagan), and a bunch of regular sh-t grade politicians. OTOH you have the party of the 1:4, a giant, unproductive 10 pound sucking tick on a very sick, anemic dog. Notice that "tick logic" is never about dollars and cents or any kind of rational fiscal reasoning, but purely emotional, "our children are starving, our country was built by immigrants, everyone should have healthcare." Add to those the "one issue voters" who claim (lynig through their teeth), "it's about abortion, it's about marijuana legalization, it's about spying." BS. It's about "I'm in the 1:4, I know my life will never be anything because I'm a lazy, unmotivated, spoiled, privileged POS, but damned if I don't know how to vote to extort and steal more money for myself with the assistance of the big gun of govt!" That's what it's really all about. All the other facade is "let me rationalize/look at myself in the mirror in the morning without knowing what a thieving creep/waste of human skin I am."

The framers left out one very important check and balance, a separate fiscal congress. In matters of tax rates, transfer payments, and govt operational budgets not related to strict enumerated powers (strict meaning unmodified by the necessary and proper clause or any possibility of SCOTUS graft), something the framers would not have conceived, the 1:4 SIMPLY SHOULDN'T VOTE. They can vote for everything else, just not to extract money violently for their own benefit. As long as people can vote themselves money, they will continue to do it. Without that, the democratic party wouldn't even exist, and what we would have would be the GOP as the "liberal" party and a balancing conservative party.

Republicans are generally stupid with plenty of liars and thieves thrown in, democrats are all the most hypocritical, sociopathic liars and thieves. Hard to choose, but I'd have to go with "stupid." I guess I'd rather be run over by Mr. Magoo than eaten by Jeffrey Dahmer.

 

[Don_Dom]

Those with graduate degrees voted for Obama in 2012 by 55-42% margin.

He's talking about uninformed voters...There's a difference. Graduate degrees mean nothing unless you break it down by private sector employment versus everyone else. Doesn't matter how on-paper educated anyone is unless you look at where they work.

The vast majority of government employees will always vote democrat because it is in their interests to do so. I believe it was George Bernard Shaw who said "Those who rob Peter to pay Paul will always get the vote of Paul." There are positions in the government that require advanced degrees and the government does underwrite loans and provide grants to qualifying government employees so they can advance. They overwhemingly vote democrat.

Academia, obviously, is entirely populated by people with advanced degrees. Not only does academia depend on big government financially, but there is a near cult-like religion in academia that requires that those in it be liberal democrats. And the vast majority are. Which is ironic considering that Keynesean economics, for example, have never once worked in the real world it has ever been tried, the results ranging from disaster at best to millions dead and entire nations, literally, in rubble, bit it lives on gloriously in the imaginations of liberal politicians and college professors. If you don't tow the line with this, the global warming hoax, and everything else liberal your chances of getting grants drop dramaticly. These people live in a fantasyland of theory devoid of results based rewards and they overwhemingly vote democrat.

Two very common professions that permeate every sector of the economy and require advanced degrees are the legal and accounting professions. These people generally benefit from businesses doing well, but they require government to keep them essential. Our tax code is so complex that it is literally impossible to do business without a CPA and it is a challenge to file ones own personal taxes without one. Lawyers benefit from everything complicated by big and intrusive government and a free-die-all tort system like ours. Ours is the worst on the planet, thanks to democrats. No surprise, these people overwhemingly vote democrat.

The rest of the private sector is a toss up. You don't necessarily need advanced degrees to succeed in business, but those successful in business generally know how to run things better and know what's best economicly than any other segment.

So, your point is moot. And that number would be a lot lower, anyway, if it was voters with graduate degrees EMPLOYED IN PRIVATE SECTOR ENTERPRISES THAT CONTRIBUTE TO THE GDP. They are the ones that really matter. Everything else is "playing at" business or some government or academic stroke job.

 

[Syrio]

Why the fvck are people arguing about politics on this forum, this is so dumb.

 

[Kingpin Pimp]

He's talking about uninformed voters...There's a difference. Graduate degrees mean nothing unless you break it down by private sector employment versus everyone else. Doesn't matter how on-paper educated anyone is unless you look at where they work.

The vast majority of government employees will always vote democrat because it is in their interests to do so. I believe it was George Bernard Shaw who said "Those who rob Peter to pay Paul will always get the vote of Paul." There are positions in the government thatcrewuire advanced degrees and the government does underwrite loans and provide grants to qualifying government employees so they can advance. They overwhemingly vote democrat.

Academia, obviously, is entirely populated by people with advanced degrees. Not only does academia depend on big government financially, but there is a near cult-like religion in academia that requires that those in it be liberal democrats. And the vast majority are. Which is ironic considering that Keynesean economics, for example, have never once worked in the real world it has ever been tried, the results ranging from disaster at best to millions dead and entire nations, literally, in rubble, bit it lives on gloriously in the imaginations of liberal politicians and college professors. If you don't tow the line with this, the global warming hoax, and everything else liberal your chances of getting grants drop dramaticly. These people live in a fantasyland of theory devoid of results based rewards and they overwhemingly vote democrat.

Two very common professions that permeate every sector of the economy and require advanced degrees are the legal and accounting professions. These people generally benefit from businesses doing well, but they require government to keep them essential. Our tax code is so complex that it is literally impossible to do business without a CPA and it is a challenge to file ones own personal taxes without one. Lawyers benefit from everything complicated by big and intrusive government and a free-die-all tort system like ours. Ours is the worst on the planet, thanks to democrats. No surprise, these people overwhemingly vote democrat.

The rest of the private sector is a toss up. You don't necessarily need advanced degrees to succeed in business, but those successful in business generally know how to run things better and know what's best economicly than any other segment.

So, your point is moot. And that number would be a lot lower, anyway, if it was voters with graduate degrees EMPLOYED IN PRIVATE SECTOR ENTERPRISES THAT CONTRIBUTE TO THE GDP. They are the ones that really matter. Everything else is "playing at" business or some government or academic stroke job.

Maybe you are the uninformed one. Danger already explained it perfectly. Even if Romney had won not a damned thing would be different right now, except Romney would have overturned the states new weed laws and we would be in more wars like Syria or Iran, which would mean Romney is worse.

 

[Don_Dom]

I'm on my phone and don't have it in me to try to wrangle the quotes, but I love how these guys are on about how awful it would be if Romney had been elected but thankfully Obama won. It's just hilarious.

Were you guys asleep when Obama and the stooge Kerry tried to GET US TO GO TO WAR in Syria last fall? Like 3 or 4 months ago. They put the full court press on domesticly and internationally TRYING TO GET US IN A WAR that we had zero interest in. It was so bad even Vladimir Putin, one of the sneakiest evil rat bastards of our time, pretty much said "Not only are these amatures liars, they are really bad at it, too." LOL. Notice how the whole thing went away practically the day after they dropped it? Because it was a made up non-issue to begin with, timed perfectly with the Oct 1 rollout of the Obamacare fiasco. They wanted to GET US IN A WAR solely to distract attention from the failure of their signature domestic policy.

Police state? I seem to remember liberals and the press crapping themselves sideways over the patriot act and the NSA monitoring international calls that had a suspected terrorist on one end. Obama has renewed the patriot act and he has PUBLICLY ENDORSED as recently as two weeks ago the NSA monitoring everything domesticly from texts and emails to phone calls. And that's just what we know of. There is something new near daily. Hell, just today it came out that the NSA can monitor actual content on your phone via hacking certain apps. This is all happening under Obama.

How you guys can, with a straight face, as that ANYTHING would be worse under Romney or any other republican president is all the evidence anyone needs that you aren't exactly playing with a full deck. Obama has already flown the plane into the fvcking mountain. Short of actual martial law, it really can't get all that much worse. Jesus H.

But, oh, I forget. You can smoke pot easier now. The true test of freedom. Get a grip. The only reason Obama is doing it is because he knows that it will score him points with people just like you. That you'll be so happy about that that you will ignore that he is the most radical, dictatorial president in this country's history with the possible exception of Lincoln. I love smoking weed, for the record, but I love my constitutional republic even more. You should be INSULTED that he thinks you are so stupid that you can be placated with weed while he enslaves the entire economy (and by extension all of us) with his heath care law, harrasses his political opponents with selective enforcement of the tax code, violates the 4th amendment rights of every person in the country with the NSA, violates his oath of office by instructing his branch of government to selectively enforce the law, etc etc etc.

He's running the executive like a dictatorship. Bush, or Nixon for that matter, on their worst days NEVER disrespected the constitution or rule of law like Obama does as a matter of routine daily business. If those guys had done any ONE thing that Obama has the left and media in this county would still be crying about it....Like Mr. It's All Bush's fault above....Like all selective memory liberal HYPOCRITES he cites a decade old issue while completely skipping over the fact that Obama tried to do the SAME THING, purely for poitical cover, a few months ago. It's ridiculous. If there weren't so many of you, it would be hysterically funny.

Obama is the most dictatorial EVIL president this county has ever had and that's why most people who voted against him voted for Romney. Not because we like silly ass Mitt Romney. I would have voted for my dog in that election if I thought he had a chance of winning.

Desain.....Totally agree. I was once in a discussion about what you would do if you could pass any amendment to the constitution. Most of the conservatives had some predictable term limits thing or balanced budget. Mine would make anyone employed by or married to someone employed by a government entity inelligible to vote in electons for that government entity. It's a simple conflict of interest. If that dynamic existed in the private sector people would to to jail. That plus some good reforms to lobbying and campaign finance would take care if the vast majority of problems. It will never end until politicians can no longer buy votes with other peoples money. And both parties are guilty of it, the democrats just happen to he worse.

Honestly, to accept the current system and actually believe what democrats (including Barack Obama) or republicans feed you is about as blue pill as it gets. We probably shouldn't get into politics here but, in that regard, it may be appropriate.

 

[backbreaker]

On one side, Obama, liberals make it easy for women to pop out babies and collect money from the state. Make it easier for women in child custody cases and divorce cases


on the other side, conservatives are pro life and don't believe in abortions and believe that blindly getting married is the cure to all your problems in life.


Both parties do a **** job representing men's interests.



seriously reading this thread.. how the **** does anyone on this forum get laid is beyond me rotfl. lol too damn hard core.

 

[gravityeyelids]

I didn't vote. Tear me apart if you want. But i didn't like either candidate and don't want my beliefs represented by either. The only reason i would have voted was to vote against obama...but fvck it. I would've voted for ron paul. but let's be realistic. An independent party is NEVER going to win. this government depresses me.

As a side note, be careful, keep it civil guys in this thread. Technically arguing religion and politics on this forum are not allowed because it causes so much anger, so the mods are most likely going to come shut this down soon if we get out of hand

 

[Bokanovsky]

I just recognize that Romney would have been no different for the 100+ year trend of growing government and weakened individual freedoms.

Bush gave us the Patriot Act. Obama just expanded on it. As I stated before, if there is one thing both sides can agree on it is the trampling of citizens rights.

Exactly right. Obama and Romney are two sides of the same coin. Anybody who believes that there are policy differences between the Republicans and Democrats (on things that actually matter) or that the U.S. is a "democracy" needs to have his head examined. I laugh at the so-called African Americans who voted for Obama because they thought he was going to be their "homeboy" in the White house. Obama isn't even an African American to begin with. His dad was a Kenyan witch doctor and his mom was a white wh0re from Kansas (who, ironically, descended from a slave owning family).

 

[( . )( . )]

Well that's completely reasonable. With such rational voters it's hard to believe the Republicans have been out of power for two terms.

Considering the speed you big gov/Godless chicks and leeching minorities on the left are sending his country spinning down the sh!tter I thought his reply was pretty tame in all honesty.

Have you ever had a thought that you didn't start a thread over?

The phuck are you talking about woman? It's the first post and valid point I've seen HumbleNinja make in a long time.