So most women SAY that they are disatisfied in a relationship and that guys just "dont get it".

WRONG!

As we all know here, ******** is strictly meaningless.

What women SAY and what they THINK are diametrically opposed because they need to fool themselves psychologically into thinking that theyre actually looking for a "good guy " when in reality, theyre looking for an "attractive" guy.

All women want the ATTRACTIVE guy (looks, money, power, humor ).

Actions speak louder than words.

If women WANTED a nice good guy, they could EASILY HAVE ONE.

They dont want one, so they are forced to SAY they want one in order to justify themselves to themselves.

Its not that simple.
Nice guys doesnt neccessarily mean fun guys or guys that are interesting. (keep in mind Some "nice guys" arnt really that nice and are jerks and dont realize it.) [Not pointing the finger at anyone here though]

You have to define what you mean "the ATTRACTIVE guy ".
People could be attractive in apperance only.
(Money and Apperance are not necessarily inclusive.)


It is usually older women who want nicer guys. Because simply some guys may be fun to be around for awhile but they soon realize they act like immature jerks.

Originally posted by NeverFear
So most women SAY that they are disatisfied in a relationship and that guys just "dont get it".

WRONG!

As we all know here, ******** is strictly meaningless.

What women SAY and what they THINK are diametrically opposed because they need to fool themselves psychologically into thinking that theyre actually looking for a "good guy " when in reality, theyre looking for an "attractive" guy.

All women want the ATTRACTIVE guy (looks, money, power, humor ).

Actions speak louder than words.

If women WANTED a nice good guy, they could EASILY HAVE ONE.

They dont want one, so they are forced to SAY they want one in order to justify themselves to themselves.

Click to expand...

Women are never f**king satisfied. They read too many romance novels and they all think, "Hey, that girl in the story has a c00ter, I have a c00ter, therefore, I DESERVE A FABIO-STYLE PRINCE CHARMING!!"

Yeah, well the girl in the story is rich, beautiful, compassionate, independent, strong-hearted, and sexy, too. Oh yeah, and SHE DOESN'T EXIST. When you're like that, you can go looking for your dude on the white horse.

http://www.nomarriage.com/perfectguy.html

Satisfaction is boring anyway.

Post a link to the article.

http://www.sosuave.com/

It's on the front page man.

'The statement seems to separate you from most men out there that do not know how to treat a woman.'

Click to expand...

This is textbook AFC thinking. How can I better identify with women to set myself apart? It's not similarities that attract women, but the opposites. Women don't want to fvck other women (heterosexual ones anyway) so don't become one in the process.

I'm surprised all of you interpreted the acting in the article as AFC. Do it in a relaxed and funny (not dorkish) way & it's coming around as alpha, naturally having a lot of experience/knowledge/skills, which is interesting and attractive. NO CHILDISH BRAGGING, however. Just self confident.

I used the same method several times without reading the article and it works like charm (for me).

It's often good to show her you know the games and tests and don't give a ****. To back it up you can comment on the game around.

Even the keyboard jockeys could pull this.

MoveYourA$$... and your brain will follow

ah, yes, Rollo Thomassi, you are completely right!

Just...: here it's not about some wussie AFC understanding and ass-kissing, it's about knowing them, beeing able to read them, even being dangerously good at it, but to have good intentions as long as they do not try to fool you, to be able and willing to tease and excite them, to make them experience extacy... but only if YOU want it.

and has nothing to do with becoming a barbie yourself.

Re: Re: "80 % Women Disatisfied" Article TOTALLY BULL****. Actually....

Originally posted by squirrels
http://www.nomarriage.com/perfectguy.html

Satisfaction is boring anyway.

Click to expand...

OMFG!!! THIS CHICK IS DEMENTED! The problem is theyr all like that

Originally posted by Rollo Tomassi
http://www.sosuave.com/

It's on the front page man.



This is textbook AFC thinking. How can I better identify with women to set myself apart? It's not similarities that attract women, but the opposites. Women don't want to fvck other women (heterosexual ones anyway) so don't become one in the process.

Click to expand...

Well fvck me!! :crackup: By the way, I agree with you. It's articles like that one that makes me bypass the home page altogether.

Originally posted by MoveYourAss...
I'm surprised all of you interpreted the acting in the article as AFC. Do it in a relaxed and funny (not dorkish) way & it's coming around as alpha, naturally having a lot of experience/knowledge/skills, which is interesting and attractive. NO CHILDISH BRAGGING, however. Just self confident.

Click to expand...

That's where the article seems a bit AFC in style. It sounds as if he's expounding the necessity to actually tell a woman that you are different. I feel that if she can not tell you are different by your actions and that you need to tell her, you aren't really a DJ.

Francisco, it's the typical problem of communication by words only. Loads of misunderstndings, and often you automatically get one interpretation in your head.

Yes, actions speak louder than words, and words only are not as trustable, at least as long as you don't talk with utmost confidence (REAL confidence).

Maybe see it like this: the frame set up in the article for instance could be like a "little sister"- frame, you call her on her **** and testing etc.

Well, a lot of words... I understand you interpret it differently, from my experience there is a way this stuff works nicely.

Good side effects: the conversation topic goes in a good direction, triggering thoughts in her about sex. OK, here again we can wondrfully argue. Clearly, this has to be done right, otherwise you come off as a verbal erotic who does actually have NO game and NO sex.

MOST IMPORTANT: don't see the "80%..." line as crucial, something which does the trick. I never used this one, just the general frame of the article, although I'll try it asap as a "i have a BF"-reply.

Funny, but most lines I have to force myself to use for the first time, like: ah, NOW you can say that, do it. Usually sucks, but with most girls you can continue the game anyway. Only after this initial investment I can pull the lines spontaneously, calmly and with the right attitude.

After reading this I began just casually telling women that over 80% of all women are not happy and would like more from men. I also added that most men do not know how to treat a woman properly and how to appreciate a woman.

Click to expand...

This is the same AFC nonsense that guys swallow when they say they're "working" on their relationships. All it ever amounts to is a man progressively attempting to better compromise himself to supplicate to a woman's misguided expectations of what her idealized (see fantasy) relationship should be. And this is usually molded by her girlfriends, mother or Cosmopolitan magazine.

What exactly would constitue treating or appreciating a woman 'properly'. I mean, if this is a ruse to get you laid, hey great, but if you're ever called to the floor on this bvllsh!t and had to elaborate on treating a woman 'correctly' what would you say?

The major problem with popping off with lines like, "most guys don't know how to properly treat a woman" implies that you do. How many Nice Guy Symps have used this inferrence with them before? This idiocy presumes that women wont interpret your not-so-subtle covert message as being anything less than an attempt to identify with them in order to generate attraction. The only message it really sends is that you have a desire to be another one of her confidant girlfriends.

Originally posted by Rollo Tomassi
The major problem with popping off with lines like, "most guys don't know how to properly treat a woman" implies that you do. How many Nice Guy Symps have used this inferrence with them before? This idiocy presumes that women wont interpret your not-so-subtle covert message as being anything less than an attempt to identify with them in order to generate attraction. The only message it really sends is that you have a desire to be another one of her confidant girlfriends.

Click to expand...

Now that's what I'm talking about...

Thank God I was not the only one disgusted by that AFC article!

Going up to women and telling them you know how to treat them properly!! Ridicluous, I would like to see this work!

Of course Brad Pitt can do it, but they already want him no matter what he says.

Who allowed this trash to be posted on the home page!?! It is exactly the opposite of what we are teaching here!!

DIetzcoi

women settle for what they have, all women cant have the djs,djs are a rare breed.
besides even though women arnt satisfied with what they have, they pretend like they are.
and i think its afc using that 80percent crap for a chatup line.