ZeeOwl
Senior Don Juan
For background on me, see my 1st field report:
http://www.sosuave.com/vBulletin/showthread.php?s=&threadid=38382
Nothing earth-shattering to tell here. I'm doing it for the benefit of the newbies, to give an idea of how internet dating goes, and also to get constructive criticism on what I did (or failed to do
).
Background on her (from her profile)
7...8 (vacation photo, though not the classic bikini shot, can't see her really well because of what she's wearing).
34, 1m54 (5'1"), slim, non-smoker, social drinker.
Looking for girl-friends or a lover.
No kids, undecided about having some.
"Other" religion.
Post-secondary education.
Initial contact
September 5th.
I sent her a Krynnster style eMail (plays on originality and mystery) which is the approach I use most often. It also includes an element of telling the woman that she needs to respond (to satisfy her curiosity). It's effective on women who are looking for stimulating company, or a STR/LTR, but don't have an "attitude". I also headline it with "Do not open before tomorrow's date..." just to see what she'll do.
She writes back that I shouldn't worry about not a getting a response, as she always responds, even to guys she isn't interested in. She thinks I'm a talented intro eMail writer, and that mine almost looks personal. Basically she's being ****y, and telling me that she's smart enough to see through canned intros.
September 8th.
I laugh at her ****iness and tell her I think it's cute. I tell her I'll have to punish her for opening my letter too soon, so I'm only going to answer her properly tomorrow. Then I shoot a ****y/dominant comment back.
September 9th.
I acknowledge that my intro looks personal, neither confirming nor denying it. I ask her (in a ****y way) to tell me about herself, since her profile only talks about what she wants.
She refuses (in a ****y way) to give me any info, and taunts me to meet her in person if I want to find out.
September 10th (Wednesday).
I tell her I'm glad she has a sense of humour and is playing along. I tease her about not knowing about a pop-culture reference I made in my previous eMail. I say I'm willing to play along with her mystery woman act, since she's been co-operative with me. Tell her I'm busy for the next few days, but will be in Montreal (I live 130 km from Montreal) Sunday evening. I tell her to give me her phone number.
September 13th (Saturday).
She says she's harmless, and gives me her phone number.
September 16th (Tuesday).
I tell her she missed the boat. I was gone for the weekend and really busy (listing all the things I did). Say I'll call her this week, and that I should be back in Montreal within a few days.
Taking it to the phone level
September 18th (Thursday).
Tried calling her, no answer, no answering machine.
September 21st (Sunday).
I waited a few days to call again, in case she has caller ID (don't want to come across as too eager or desperate). It was an interesting and enlightening convo, a perfect example of how some people play a role on the internet. No sign of ****iness whatsoever. In fact, she was shy and introverted, almost submissive. I caught on immediately and took charge of the convo. She even mentioned that she's a bit of a nerd, and I can hear her typing notes while we're talking! lol I tease her about that. I ask what her schedule is like for the next few days. She seems evasive about it, basically telling me that any day/time is fine. I tell her I'll be in Montreal Wednesday. She seems a little dissapointed that it's not sooner. We get into talking about where and what time to meet, and again she seems evasive, and is fine with any time that suits me. I'm thinking "red flag!, she's unemployed (welfare?) and doesn't have a life". I find out she lives near one of the places I'm going, so we set it for noon Wednesday at that place. I then run DD's anti-flake and LJBF/qualifying sequences on her, and cut off the convo.
Time: about 20 minutes.
http://www.sosuave.com/vBulletin/showthread.php?s=&threadid=38382
Nothing earth-shattering to tell here. I'm doing it for the benefit of the newbies, to give an idea of how internet dating goes, and also to get constructive criticism on what I did (or failed to do
Background on her (from her profile)
7...8 (vacation photo, though not the classic bikini shot, can't see her really well because of what she's wearing).
34, 1m54 (5'1"), slim, non-smoker, social drinker.
Looking for girl-friends or a lover.
No kids, undecided about having some.
"Other" religion.
Post-secondary education.
Initial contact
September 5th.
I sent her a Krynnster style eMail (plays on originality and mystery) which is the approach I use most often. It also includes an element of telling the woman that she needs to respond (to satisfy her curiosity). It's effective on women who are looking for stimulating company, or a STR/LTR, but don't have an "attitude". I also headline it with "Do not open before tomorrow's date..." just to see what she'll do.
She writes back that I shouldn't worry about not a getting a response, as she always responds, even to guys she isn't interested in. She thinks I'm a talented intro eMail writer, and that mine almost looks personal. Basically she's being ****y, and telling me that she's smart enough to see through canned intros.
September 8th.
I laugh at her ****iness and tell her I think it's cute. I tell her I'll have to punish her for opening my letter too soon, so I'm only going to answer her properly tomorrow. Then I shoot a ****y/dominant comment back.
September 9th.
I acknowledge that my intro looks personal, neither confirming nor denying it. I ask her (in a ****y way) to tell me about herself, since her profile only talks about what she wants.
She refuses (in a ****y way) to give me any info, and taunts me to meet her in person if I want to find out.
September 10th (Wednesday).
I tell her I'm glad she has a sense of humour and is playing along. I tease her about not knowing about a pop-culture reference I made in my previous eMail. I say I'm willing to play along with her mystery woman act, since she's been co-operative with me. Tell her I'm busy for the next few days, but will be in Montreal (I live 130 km from Montreal) Sunday evening. I tell her to give me her phone number.
September 13th (Saturday).
She says she's harmless, and gives me her phone number.
September 16th (Tuesday).
I tell her she missed the boat. I was gone for the weekend and really busy (listing all the things I did). Say I'll call her this week, and that I should be back in Montreal within a few days.
Taking it to the phone level
September 18th (Thursday).
Tried calling her, no answer, no answering machine.
September 21st (Sunday).
I waited a few days to call again, in case she has caller ID (don't want to come across as too eager or desperate). It was an interesting and enlightening convo, a perfect example of how some people play a role on the internet. No sign of ****iness whatsoever. In fact, she was shy and introverted, almost submissive. I caught on immediately and took charge of the convo. She even mentioned that she's a bit of a nerd, and I can hear her typing notes while we're talking! lol I tease her about that. I ask what her schedule is like for the next few days. She seems evasive about it, basically telling me that any day/time is fine. I tell her I'll be in Montreal Wednesday. She seems a little dissapointed that it's not sooner. We get into talking about where and what time to meet, and again she seems evasive, and is fine with any time that suits me. I'm thinking "red flag!, she's unemployed (welfare?) and doesn't have a life". I find out she lives near one of the places I'm going, so we set it for noon Wednesday at that place. I then run DD's anti-flake and LJBF/qualifying sequences on her, and cut off the convo.
Time: about 20 minutes.
