Should a wife not have to have sex with her husband if she doesn't want to?

[MatureDJ]

http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2012/07/16/james_braly_and_breastfeeding_in_a_sexless_marriag e_the_marriage_is_to_blame.html?wpisrc=newsletter_ slatest

I'm a huge feminist, so of course I believe that no one should be having sex they don't want to have, even to indulge a long-term partner.

If my future wife were to stop "indulging" me and keep her legs closed, she wouldn't be my wife for too long. :trouble:

[samspade]

Once again I didn't read the link because I don't want to throw up. Besides it's Slate, I know already what side it's on.

Here's the scoop: No one should have to have sex with anyone they don't want to. Your life, your body.

But nobody needs to stay with anyone they don't want to either. As you said MDJ, no sex=see ya.

[Down Low]

Alienation of affection, it's called, and it's grounds for divorce.

When a woman won't wean a child, the ever-larger kid literally kicks the father out of bed several times a night, and kicks him away from tittie svcking on the couch. The woman b1tches that they hurt, but who does she deny? Right. Been there. (Gotta love it when the people who write about and comment upon these issues leave out such key details as the kid taking up the man's half of the bed. It exposes these feminists as child haters who have no real-world experience in parenting. Even in this article, it was mentioned only metaphorically, and not as a physical fact.)

About the man whose needs are abandoned and neglected during a pvssy strike, the article says:

"It's a shame, because the whole thing reinforces a prevalent sex-negative narrative in our culture that holds that anyone who is unceremoniously cut off from sex in their relationship, yet still expected to be monogamous, is a shallow monster if they take issue with it."

Withholding sex is abuse. It ends the relationship.

It's a straw man argument to say that no one should be forced into sex. Entering into a relationship is voluntary. No one was forced into it. Either party can walk at any time. Withholding sex is a passive-aggressive way to walk, while pretending that the man is the "bad guy" for making an unreasonable sexual demand. Bull! Men need sex regularly. Every night, every week, whatever, but regularly. This is common knowledge. Seeking regular sex is not unreasonable.

[Sir Psycho Sexy]

I would not divorce her unless she tried to stop me from getting sex from other women.

[Burroughs]

We as men were beyond ignorant in this matter

for millions of years we knew that our women were there to cook for us, care for us, raise our kids, and fvck us on demand...in short women were there to serve men..in all capacities at all times.

then for some reason (rockefeller's grand design for a consumer state governed by vacillating women who needed to buy clothes every week) women were granted rights, no fault divorce etc.

now women 'have the option' of sleeping with their husband, and husbands are not even allowed to smack the $hit out of their wives for even trying this insolence....the world of western man is crumbling is it any surprise our society is doing the same?

[GhengisT]

Alienation of affection, it's called, and it's grounds for divorce.

When a woman won't wean a child, the ever-larger kid literally kicks the father out of bed several times a night, and kicks him away from tittie svcking on the couch. The woman b1tches that they hurt, but who does she deny? Right. Been there. (Gotta love it when the people who write about and comment upon these issues leave out such key details as the kid taking up the man's half of the bed. It exposes these feminists as child haters who have no real-world experience in parenting. Even in this article, it was mentioned only metaphorically, and not as a physical fact.)

About the man whose needs are abandoned and neglected during a pvssy strike, the article says:

"It's a shame, because the whole thing reinforces a prevalent sex-negative narrative in our culture that holds that anyone who is unceremoniously cut off from sex in their relationship, yet still expected to be monogamous, is a shallow monster if they take issue with it."

Withholding sex is abuse. It ends the relationship.

It's a straw man argument to say that no one should be forced into sex. Entering into a relationship is voluntary. No one was forced into it. Either party can walk at any time. Withholding sex is a passive-aggressive way to walk, while pretending that the man is the "bad guy" for making an unreasonable sexual demand. Bull! Men need sex regularly. Every night, every week, whatever, but regularly. This is common knowledge. Seeking regular sex is not unreasonable.

Copy & Paste

[usher22]

If she don't want that night and the husband insist him for sex then he will not enjoy that because she doesn't done that by heart.

[Mauser96]

Sex in a relationship is expected. If it disappears, I disappear.