zekko
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2009
- Messages
- 16,467
- Reaction score
- 9,563
I was watching this show "Science of Sex Appeal" on the Discovery Channel the other day. I've seen bits of it before but this part stuck out in my mind. They were studying people in a speed dating situation. Basically the conclusions they came up with were this:
1. Guys were giving clear signals when they were interested in the girl, and observers were able to easily pick this up.
2. Women were not giving clear signals when they were interested, and observers were not able to pick them up.
3. Guys tended to think the girls were into them, when in most cases they were not.
This was because the guys were attracted to the appearance of the girls, but the girls were screening for provider type qualities. They would ask a lot of questions (like what is your job, etc). Because they asked a lot of questions, they seemed interested, so the guys assumed they were attracted to them. But it was actually part of the screening process.
However, they said that it's a good thing that guys assume that girls are attracted to them, because otherwise they would likely miss many mating opportunities.
1. Guys were giving clear signals when they were interested in the girl, and observers were able to easily pick this up.
2. Women were not giving clear signals when they were interested, and observers were not able to pick them up.
3. Guys tended to think the girls were into them, when in most cases they were not.
This was because the guys were attracted to the appearance of the girls, but the girls were screening for provider type qualities. They would ask a lot of questions (like what is your job, etc). Because they asked a lot of questions, they seemed interested, so the guys assumed they were attracted to them. But it was actually part of the screening process.
However, they said that it's a good thing that guys assume that girls are attracted to them, because otherwise they would likely miss many mating opportunities.
